Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Relics & Rituals: Excalibur -- Any thoughts?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wombat" data-source="post: 1495175" data-attributes="member: 8447"><p>I picked the book up due to my fascination with All Thing Arthurian (hmmm, sounds like a show on NPR...). While I find some of it intriguing, I am confused by other sections.</p><p></p><p>One of my biggest confusions is the difference between their two baseline settings: Arthurian & Excalibur. </p><p></p><p>The Excalibur setting makes some sense from their definition -- it is essentially the uber-high magic, standard D&D-ness with a few touches of the Arthurian legends attached to it. You have multiple races, lots of flinging fireballs, etc., but you also have the Heraldry Domain for clerics and the Honor Point system.</p><p></p><p>The Arthurian setting, however, is a huge jumble that ends up defining absolutely nothing. "The advice given for Arthurian campaigns at large showcases the many different approaches one can take to incorporating (or, if necessary, excluding) the core classes into a game, be it gritty low-magic fantasy set in Arthur's England or a high-maigc chivalric campaign set in a particularly chivalrous feudal realm in a more 'archetypal' fantasy world." (R&R: Ex p30). So, "Arthurian" means grim and gritty, except when it doesn't, and it means low magic, except when it doesn't. Further on you find it means historically accurate, except when it doesn't. Ultimately I think the folks at S&S would have been better served if they had not really <em>talked </em> about the Arthurian setting and just stuck with the Excalibur setting. The only other option would have been to split the Arthurian setting into two (or more) sub-settings (say, an Arthurian setting for low-magic/gritty and a Camelot setting for high magic/fantastical), but that is just an idea.</p><p></p><p>For a High Fantasy, High Magic, Elves-as-knights setting the R&R: Ex is pretty good. I don't want to downplay what is available in the volume. I haven't finished reading through the entire book yet, but so far I have found very little I would cull from it for forthcoming campaigns. OTOH, I will look better on the shelf than <em>I, Mordred</em>, which means all is good. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wombat, post: 1495175, member: 8447"] I picked the book up due to my fascination with All Thing Arthurian (hmmm, sounds like a show on NPR...). While I find some of it intriguing, I am confused by other sections. One of my biggest confusions is the difference between their two baseline settings: Arthurian & Excalibur. The Excalibur setting makes some sense from their definition -- it is essentially the uber-high magic, standard D&D-ness with a few touches of the Arthurian legends attached to it. You have multiple races, lots of flinging fireballs, etc., but you also have the Heraldry Domain for clerics and the Honor Point system. The Arthurian setting, however, is a huge jumble that ends up defining absolutely nothing. "The advice given for Arthurian campaigns at large showcases the many different approaches one can take to incorporating (or, if necessary, excluding) the core classes into a game, be it gritty low-magic fantasy set in Arthur's England or a high-maigc chivalric campaign set in a particularly chivalrous feudal realm in a more 'archetypal' fantasy world." (R&R: Ex p30). So, "Arthurian" means grim and gritty, except when it doesn't, and it means low magic, except when it doesn't. Further on you find it means historically accurate, except when it doesn't. Ultimately I think the folks at S&S would have been better served if they had not really [I]talked [/I] about the Arthurian setting and just stuck with the Excalibur setting. The only other option would have been to split the Arthurian setting into two (or more) sub-settings (say, an Arthurian setting for low-magic/gritty and a Camelot setting for high magic/fantastical), but that is just an idea. For a High Fantasy, High Magic, Elves-as-knights setting the R&R: Ex is pretty good. I don't want to downplay what is available in the volume. I haven't finished reading through the entire book yet, but so far I have found very little I would cull from it for forthcoming campaigns. OTOH, I will look better on the shelf than [I]I, Mordred[/I], which means all is good. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Relics & Rituals: Excalibur -- Any thoughts?
Top