Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Remote Desktop To Rule them All?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Merkuri" data-source="post: 4892555" data-attributes="member: 41321"><p>This will likely not be true. One of the things that most remote desktops cannot do is video. I would not expect to be able to run modern games over a remote desktop session unless you have really expensive remote desktop software and really REALLY good network equipment. Most networks can't handle the amount of data needed to replicate a fast-moving image like from a movie or a game.</p><p></p><p>Honestly, for a home setup I do not think this is worth it. Most things the average home user wants to do on a machine (check email, word processing, browse the web) they can do with a cheap machine even without remoting into a hefty server. The exception is video games and movies, and if you want to do that over remote desktop you will probably end up spending as much on the RD software and network equipment than you would on decent PCs that each have a decent video card.</p><p></p><p>Also keep in mind that in most cases two computers each running one copy of an intensive program (like a game) will often perform better than one suped-up computer running two copies of that same program simply because there are fewer places to get bottlenecked if there are multiple machines doing the work (for example, no matter how huge your server machine is, it only has one bus).</p><p></p><p>In my experience (I'm a technical support manager), remote desktop is only good in factory/business environments where the central server is expected to do some serious non-video-related calculations and the remote clients are just there to view that data. Or if you are running one "headless" system (a PC without a monitor, mouse, or keyboard).</p><p></p><p>You could, however, buy one "headless" machine to use as a file server. That machine doesn't even have to be anything special, it just has to have a network card and a ginormous hard drive. Then everyone in the family could keep their files on that machine. (Just make sure you do regular backups in case that one machine goes kaput.)</p><p></p><p>Edit: Something else to think about is that if you do get an RD system working and the main server goes down for some reason then all of the machines in your house are now just crappy machines that don't have any software installed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Merkuri, post: 4892555, member: 41321"] This will likely not be true. One of the things that most remote desktops cannot do is video. I would not expect to be able to run modern games over a remote desktop session unless you have really expensive remote desktop software and really REALLY good network equipment. Most networks can't handle the amount of data needed to replicate a fast-moving image like from a movie or a game. Honestly, for a home setup I do not think this is worth it. Most things the average home user wants to do on a machine (check email, word processing, browse the web) they can do with a cheap machine even without remoting into a hefty server. The exception is video games and movies, and if you want to do that over remote desktop you will probably end up spending as much on the RD software and network equipment than you would on decent PCs that each have a decent video card. Also keep in mind that in most cases two computers each running one copy of an intensive program (like a game) will often perform better than one suped-up computer running two copies of that same program simply because there are fewer places to get bottlenecked if there are multiple machines doing the work (for example, no matter how huge your server machine is, it only has one bus). In my experience (I'm a technical support manager), remote desktop is only good in factory/business environments where the central server is expected to do some serious non-video-related calculations and the remote clients are just there to view that data. Or if you are running one "headless" system (a PC without a monitor, mouse, or keyboard). You could, however, buy one "headless" machine to use as a file server. That machine doesn't even have to be anything special, it just has to have a network card and a ginormous hard drive. Then everyone in the family could keep their files on that machine. (Just make sure you do regular backups in case that one machine goes kaput.) Edit: Something else to think about is that if you do get an RD system working and the main server goes down for some reason then all of the machines in your house are now just crappy machines that don't have any software installed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Remote Desktop To Rule them All?
Top