Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Removal of class-based stat bonuses?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="overgeeked" data-source="post: 6663226" data-attributes="member: 86653"><p>You seem to take a rather monolithic view of "lore" and "fantasy". Just because Tolkien made elves pretty and smart doesn't mean that every fantasy author ever, much less every fantasy game ever, should follow suit. Where's the creativity and uniqueness? Oh, I guess you get that from microscopic variations on the exact same tropes hammered to death over the course of 30+ years. Dextrous elven rangers. Yep. Coz that don't get old. Tough dwarven fighter. Plucky comic relief lithe halfling thief. Yawn. Gimme some variety. I'd much rather have a fat and stupid elf or a smart half-orc or a charismatic dwarf then trod those same hollow and over done stereotypes and tropes for another 30+ years.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's no mechanical guarantee that a wizard is smart. There's huge honking penalties if they're not smart. That's a wildly different thing. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I simply disagree that the fantasy genre as a whole is some monolithic thing that should kowtow to Tolkien and never do anything outside what he wrote 80 years ago. Further, that when you casually label the entirety of a given race as smarter than everyone else or the entirety of a give race as dumber than everyone else or the whole of a species as good whilst the whole of other species are evil, that's blatant racism.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In other games, sure. Not in D&D. You either play the best combo to achieve what you want or you suck. If you want to play the ultimate skill monkey and you don't take levels in bard and/or rogue (and possibly a few other things), you're doing it wrong. If you want to play a wizard you better have the highest INT possible, or you're doing it wrong. The system rewards optimization. The DMs reward optimization (despite some claiming they despise it). And most players reward optimization (despite railing against it on forums). You're sitting around a table and the DM throws an over-budget encounter at you. Either you get really, really lucky... have a party that's optimized for their roles... or you die. Sometimes groups get lucky or the DM realizes their mistake and pulls back. But it's optimization or TPK more often than not. And trust me, the next time someone comes to the table with a half-orc wizard everyone groans and loudly asks why they gimped themselves and the party. Doesn't take long for the culture to "correct" aberrant behavior. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why not? Because the game itself, the DMs, and the players all reward optimization and punish any lack thereof.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="overgeeked, post: 6663226, member: 86653"] You seem to take a rather monolithic view of "lore" and "fantasy". Just because Tolkien made elves pretty and smart doesn't mean that every fantasy author ever, much less every fantasy game ever, should follow suit. Where's the creativity and uniqueness? Oh, I guess you get that from microscopic variations on the exact same tropes hammered to death over the course of 30+ years. Dextrous elven rangers. Yep. Coz that don't get old. Tough dwarven fighter. Plucky comic relief lithe halfling thief. Yawn. Gimme some variety. I'd much rather have a fat and stupid elf or a smart half-orc or a charismatic dwarf then trod those same hollow and over done stereotypes and tropes for another 30+ years. There's no mechanical guarantee that a wizard is smart. There's huge honking penalties if they're not smart. That's a wildly different thing. No, I simply disagree that the fantasy genre as a whole is some monolithic thing that should kowtow to Tolkien and never do anything outside what he wrote 80 years ago. Further, that when you casually label the entirety of a given race as smarter than everyone else or the entirety of a give race as dumber than everyone else or the whole of a species as good whilst the whole of other species are evil, that's blatant racism. In other games, sure. Not in D&D. You either play the best combo to achieve what you want or you suck. If you want to play the ultimate skill monkey and you don't take levels in bard and/or rogue (and possibly a few other things), you're doing it wrong. If you want to play a wizard you better have the highest INT possible, or you're doing it wrong. The system rewards optimization. The DMs reward optimization (despite some claiming they despise it). And most players reward optimization (despite railing against it on forums). You're sitting around a table and the DM throws an over-budget encounter at you. Either you get really, really lucky... have a party that's optimized for their roles... or you die. Sometimes groups get lucky or the DM realizes their mistake and pulls back. But it's optimization or TPK more often than not. And trust me, the next time someone comes to the table with a half-orc wizard everyone groans and loudly asks why they gimped themselves and the party. Doesn't take long for the culture to "correct" aberrant behavior. Why not? Because the game itself, the DMs, and the players all reward optimization and punish any lack thereof. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Removal of class-based stat bonuses?
Top