Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Remove Expected Wealth Levels
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 5845281" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>I believe that in a manner not unlike the "what the customer wanted" swing cartoons, the "PC progression math" of 4e started out with a rather simple objective that gradually got more and more complicated.</p><p></p><p>The first, rather simple idea: To make adjusting monsters on the fly easy for the DM, increasing a monster by one level should increase its attack bonus and AC and other defenses by 1, and its hp by a number (6 to 10) according to its role. </p><p></p><p>Step two: This creates a 29-point difference between a 1st-level monster and a 30th-level monster. In order for the PCs to keep up, they need to gain about +29 to attack rolls and AC and other defenses between 1st to 30th level.</p><p></p><p>Step three: Level-based increases should take care of some of the difference. We'll go with a rather simple 1 point per 2 levels, instead of a more complicated formula like 2 per 3 levels or 3 per 4 levels. That takes care of 15 points, leaving us with 14.</p><p></p><p>Step four: Ability score increases would further close the gap. 3e gave +1 to an ability score once every 4 levels. To make it easier for the players to remember, we'll give out a +1 to two ability scores at every level ending with "4" or "8", and at the start of the Paragon and Epic tiers. That makes +8 to two ability scores, which accounts for another 4 points, leaving 10.</p><p></p><p>Step five: Traditionally, we also have enhancement bonuses from magic items. Since they can now go up to +6, that leaves just 4 points. We'll have a variety of methods to close the final 4 points: some feats, some item bonuses, some powers, etc. Most players would have one or two of these, and even if they don't, a four-point gap probably shouldn't be crippling.</p><p></p><p>So you see, if they were willing to use more complicated formulae for monster math or PC level-based increases, we wouldn't "need" magic items to balance the math: a 2/3 progression (+20 over 30 levels) would reduce the "required" bonus from magic items from +6 to +1, and a 3/4 progression (+22 over 30 levels) would eliminate it entirely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 5845281, member: 3424"] I believe that in a manner not unlike the "what the customer wanted" swing cartoons, the "PC progression math" of 4e started out with a rather simple objective that gradually got more and more complicated. The first, rather simple idea: To make adjusting monsters on the fly easy for the DM, increasing a monster by one level should increase its attack bonus and AC and other defenses by 1, and its hp by a number (6 to 10) according to its role. Step two: This creates a 29-point difference between a 1st-level monster and a 30th-level monster. In order for the PCs to keep up, they need to gain about +29 to attack rolls and AC and other defenses between 1st to 30th level. Step three: Level-based increases should take care of some of the difference. We'll go with a rather simple 1 point per 2 levels, instead of a more complicated formula like 2 per 3 levels or 3 per 4 levels. That takes care of 15 points, leaving us with 14. Step four: Ability score increases would further close the gap. 3e gave +1 to an ability score once every 4 levels. To make it easier for the players to remember, we'll give out a +1 to two ability scores at every level ending with "4" or "8", and at the start of the Paragon and Epic tiers. That makes +8 to two ability scores, which accounts for another 4 points, leaving 10. Step five: Traditionally, we also have enhancement bonuses from magic items. Since they can now go up to +6, that leaves just 4 points. We'll have a variety of methods to close the final 4 points: some feats, some item bonuses, some powers, etc. Most players would have one or two of these, and even if they don't, a four-point gap probably shouldn't be crippling. So you see, if they were willing to use more complicated formulae for monster math or PC level-based increases, we wouldn't "need" magic items to balance the math: a 2/3 progression (+20 over 30 levels) would reduce the "required" bonus from magic items from +6 to +1, and a 3/4 progression (+22 over 30 levels) would eliminate it entirely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Remove Expected Wealth Levels
Top