Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Removing Bonuses from Ability Scores
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sheadunne" data-source="post: 6068985" data-attributes="member: 27570"><p>I have been working on getting rid of feats. I have integrated some into skills, most into class abilities and archtypes, and a few more are now being integrated into ability scores (I'm calling the ability score feats, attributes.)</p><p></p><p>The intention is to remove ability score bonuses from the game and flatten the math a little (not as significantly as 5e is trying to do, but enough so the numbers to get out of control). </p><p></p><p>I'm in the camp that believes ability scores represent potential and not actual ability. If you have a high strength score, it doesn't mean that you can swim better, only that you have the potential to swim better. In this regard, the flat bonuses from ability scores don't make sense. I am instead creating a system whereby players choose attributes instead of gaining a flat bonus. </p><p></p><p>Example</p><p>If you have an 18 strength, you gain 4 attributes</p><p>If you have an 8 strength, you gain 1 negative attribute.</p><p></p><p>These attributes will be similar to many feats that currently exist such as Iron Will, Nimble, etc, and the negative attributes will pretty much be the reverse of those types of feats.</p><p></p><p>Players will never increase in their raw ability score but they can gain and lose attributes. </p><p></p><p>Races that gain ability score modifiers will instead gain bonus attributes or negative attributes. </p><p></p><p>Example</p><p></p><p>A halfling will gain 1 negative strength attribute instead of the -2 to strength. If the halfling has a 14 strength (2 attributes) she would instead gain 1 attribute. </p><p></p><p>An elf will gain 1 dexterity attribute instead of the +2 to dexterity. If the elf has a 14 dexterity (2 attributes) she would instead gain 3 attributes.</p><p></p><p>When characters gain levels they no long increase their ability score, but instead gain attributes which can be used to select a new attribute or remove a negative attribute. The halfling finally gains enough experience to be a good swimmer and removes his "sink like a stone" negative strength attribute.</p><p></p><p>Spells that would normally increase a characters ability scores (such as bull strength) would instead give a flat monstrous attribute such as Hulking (gain +4 damage) or something like that (still in progress). Magical items would function the same way. </p><p></p><p>Creatures/monsters would still have high ability scores and also a separate array of attributes that would reflect the creature more accurately. These attributes would be accessible to players only through spells and magic items. </p><p></p><p>A player cannot select the same attribute multiple times. This will limited the bonus gained from strength to +1 to hit. Two similar characters with the same strength score may have completely different attributes to better reflect what type of strength the character has. Are they a weight lifter? A smasher? An olympic climber? </p><p></p><p>I have also expanded saving throws to include all 6 ability scores and have been reworked to not rely on ability score modifiers (although some attributes may raise your ability score).</p><p></p><p>Are there potential issues with this system other than being more fiddly? </p><p></p><p>It has never sat well with me that a character can have a 39 strength.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sheadunne, post: 6068985, member: 27570"] I have been working on getting rid of feats. I have integrated some into skills, most into class abilities and archtypes, and a few more are now being integrated into ability scores (I'm calling the ability score feats, attributes.) The intention is to remove ability score bonuses from the game and flatten the math a little (not as significantly as 5e is trying to do, but enough so the numbers to get out of control). I'm in the camp that believes ability scores represent potential and not actual ability. If you have a high strength score, it doesn't mean that you can swim better, only that you have the potential to swim better. In this regard, the flat bonuses from ability scores don't make sense. I am instead creating a system whereby players choose attributes instead of gaining a flat bonus. Example If you have an 18 strength, you gain 4 attributes If you have an 8 strength, you gain 1 negative attribute. These attributes will be similar to many feats that currently exist such as Iron Will, Nimble, etc, and the negative attributes will pretty much be the reverse of those types of feats. Players will never increase in their raw ability score but they can gain and lose attributes. Races that gain ability score modifiers will instead gain bonus attributes or negative attributes. Example A halfling will gain 1 negative strength attribute instead of the -2 to strength. If the halfling has a 14 strength (2 attributes) she would instead gain 1 attribute. An elf will gain 1 dexterity attribute instead of the +2 to dexterity. If the elf has a 14 dexterity (2 attributes) she would instead gain 3 attributes. When characters gain levels they no long increase their ability score, but instead gain attributes which can be used to select a new attribute or remove a negative attribute. The halfling finally gains enough experience to be a good swimmer and removes his "sink like a stone" negative strength attribute. Spells that would normally increase a characters ability scores (such as bull strength) would instead give a flat monstrous attribute such as Hulking (gain +4 damage) or something like that (still in progress). Magical items would function the same way. Creatures/monsters would still have high ability scores and also a separate array of attributes that would reflect the creature more accurately. These attributes would be accessible to players only through spells and magic items. A player cannot select the same attribute multiple times. This will limited the bonus gained from strength to +1 to hit. Two similar characters with the same strength score may have completely different attributes to better reflect what type of strength the character has. Are they a weight lifter? A smasher? An olympic climber? I have also expanded saving throws to include all 6 ability scores and have been reworked to not rely on ability score modifiers (although some attributes may raise your ability score). Are there potential issues with this system other than being more fiddly? It has never sat well with me that a character can have a 39 strength. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Removing Bonuses from Ability Scores
Top