Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Removing combat distance and grids
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Halivar" data-source="post: 1772156" data-attributes="member: 9327"><p>I need to create a house-rule for d20 to simplify combat distances and remove the combat grid altogether.</p><p> </p><p> I'm currently writing a MUD from the ground up to model d20 rules as closely as possible, and I ran into a major snag: the combat grid. In a MUD, there is no concept of "distance". Everyone is in the "room" together. I thought at first about implementing a grid for every "room", but I now recognize how ludicrously complex that would make combat. Sooo... I have developed a method of removing the map grid altogether and I'd like comments or suggestions.</p><p> </p><p> <u><strong>Melee groups</strong></u></p><p> At the start of every fight, opposing sides are in separate <em>melee groups</em>. A melee group is a set of PC's, NPC's or monsters in which each member of the group can effect melee attacks and touch spells against any other member of the group. IOW, all members of the group are considered within 5 feet of each other.</p><p> </p><p> A player may use a move equivalent action to leave a melee group or change melee groups. If a player leaves a melee group, they become a melee group of one person. If they later enter another melee group, they use one move equivalency for changing melee groups. Leaving a melee group provokes attacks of opportunity from all other members of the melee group.</p><p> </p><p> In order to make an attack, a character must first enter the target's melee group. Doing so provokes an attack of opportunity from all other members of the target's melee group other than the target itself.</p><p> </p><p> If a character starts their turn alone in a melee group with more than one combatant, that character is considered flanked for opposing members of the melee group.</p><p> </p><p> A rogue may sneak attack after entering a melee group with only one member (the target).</p><p> </p><p> <strong><u>Ranged Attacks</u></strong></p><p> Ranged attacks (and ranged spells), unlike melee attacks and touch spells, can be used on any character regardless of whether they are in the same melee group or not. Note that ranged attacks into a melee group with friendly characters suffers a -4 penalty without the Precise Shot feat. Ranged attacks on targets in the same melee group receive the +1 bonus from the Point-Blank Shot feat.</p><p> </p><p> Any spell that affects multiple targets and requires a minumum distance, such as <em>chain lightning</em>, will instead require all targets to be in the same melee group.</p><p> </p><p> <u><strong>Area of Affect Spells</strong></u></p><p> AoO spells affect all characters in a targeted melee group (possibly including the caster unless the spell specifically rules this out).</p><p> </p><p> <u><strong>Example of Play</strong></u></p><p> Suppose we got two groups: FtrA, RogA, ClrA, and WizA vs. FtrB, RogB, ClrB, and WizB. Both sides start out as separate melee groups:</p><p> </p><p> Group1: FtrA, RogA, ClrA, WizA</p><p> Group2: FtrB, RogB, ClrB, WizB</p><p> </p><p> FtrA gets initiative. He charges into Group2 to attack FtrB, provoking attacks of opportunity from RogB, ClrB, and WizB in GroupB. RogA sneaks off into his own melee group to prepare to sneek attack. WizA casts <em>invis</em> and likewise sneaks off. ClrA buffs and stands. Now we have:</p><p> </p><p> Group1: ClrA</p><p> Group2: FtrB, RogB, ClrB, WizB, FtrA</p><p> Group3: RogA</p><p> Group4: WizA</p><p> </p><p> FtrB F/A's FtrA (still not flanked because he did not start his last turn by himself in Group2). RogB sneaks off (proving AoO from FtrA) to wait for WizA to show up again. ClrB casts un-buff on FtrA, and WizB steps out of the group, too.</p><p> </p><p> Group1: ClrA</p><p> Group2: FtrB, WizB, FtrA</p><p> Group3: RogA</p><p> Group4: WizA</p><p> Group5: RogB</p><p> Group6: ClrB</p><p> </p><p> Next round. FtrA F/A's FtrB, but now he's flanked for FtrB and WizB. RogA enters ClrB's Group6 and sneak attacks. WizA drops a <em>fireball</em> on Group2, hitting FtrB, WizB, and FtrA (WizA is chaotic, I guess). FtrB F/A's FtrA, RogB jumps WizA for sneak attack, and ClrB goes to town on RogA. WizB tries their chances by themeselves (AoO from FtrA). Our groups end round 2 like so:</p><p> </p><p> Group1: ClrA</p><p> Group2: FtrA, FtrB</p><p> Group4: WizA, RogB</p><p> Group6: ClrB, RogA</p><p> Group7: WizB</p><p> </p><p> I think the paradigm of "spread out for safety" applies equally well to the melee group system as to the map grid. Mages want to be as far away from melee fighters as possible, and no one wants to get swamped by multiple foes.</p><p> </p><p> Am I missing anything possibly important?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Halivar, post: 1772156, member: 9327"] I need to create a house-rule for d20 to simplify combat distances and remove the combat grid altogether. I'm currently writing a MUD from the ground up to model d20 rules as closely as possible, and I ran into a major snag: the combat grid. In a MUD, there is no concept of "distance". Everyone is in the "room" together. I thought at first about implementing a grid for every "room", but I now recognize how ludicrously complex that would make combat. Sooo... I have developed a method of removing the map grid altogether and I'd like comments or suggestions. [u][b]Melee groups[/b][/u] At the start of every fight, opposing sides are in separate [i]melee groups[/i]. A melee group is a set of PC's, NPC's or monsters in which each member of the group can effect melee attacks and touch spells against any other member of the group. IOW, all members of the group are considered within 5 feet of each other. A player may use a move equivalent action to leave a melee group or change melee groups. If a player leaves a melee group, they become a melee group of one person. If they later enter another melee group, they use one move equivalency for changing melee groups. Leaving a melee group provokes attacks of opportunity from all other members of the melee group. In order to make an attack, a character must first enter the target's melee group. Doing so provokes an attack of opportunity from all other members of the target's melee group other than the target itself. If a character starts their turn alone in a melee group with more than one combatant, that character is considered flanked for opposing members of the melee group. A rogue may sneak attack after entering a melee group with only one member (the target). [b][u]Ranged Attacks[/u][/b] Ranged attacks (and ranged spells), unlike melee attacks and touch spells, can be used on any character regardless of whether they are in the same melee group or not. Note that ranged attacks into a melee group with friendly characters suffers a -4 penalty without the Precise Shot feat. Ranged attacks on targets in the same melee group receive the +1 bonus from the Point-Blank Shot feat. Any spell that affects multiple targets and requires a minumum distance, such as [i]chain lightning[/i], will instead require all targets to be in the same melee group. [u][b]Area of Affect Spells[/b][/u] AoO spells affect all characters in a targeted melee group (possibly including the caster unless the spell specifically rules this out). [u][b]Example of Play[/b][/u] Suppose we got two groups: FtrA, RogA, ClrA, and WizA vs. FtrB, RogB, ClrB, and WizB. Both sides start out as separate melee groups: Group1: FtrA, RogA, ClrA, WizA Group2: FtrB, RogB, ClrB, WizB FtrA gets initiative. He charges into Group2 to attack FtrB, provoking attacks of opportunity from RogB, ClrB, and WizB in GroupB. RogA sneaks off into his own melee group to prepare to sneek attack. WizA casts [i]invis[/i] and likewise sneaks off. ClrA buffs and stands. Now we have: Group1: ClrA Group2: FtrB, RogB, ClrB, WizB, FtrA Group3: RogA Group4: WizA FtrB F/A's FtrA (still not flanked because he did not start his last turn by himself in Group2). RogB sneaks off (proving AoO from FtrA) to wait for WizA to show up again. ClrB casts un-buff on FtrA, and WizB steps out of the group, too. Group1: ClrA Group2: FtrB, WizB, FtrA Group3: RogA Group4: WizA Group5: RogB Group6: ClrB Next round. FtrA F/A's FtrB, but now he's flanked for FtrB and WizB. RogA enters ClrB's Group6 and sneak attacks. WizA drops a [i]fireball[/i] on Group2, hitting FtrB, WizB, and FtrA (WizA is chaotic, I guess). FtrB F/A's FtrA, RogB jumps WizA for sneak attack, and ClrB goes to town on RogA. WizB tries their chances by themeselves (AoO from FtrA). Our groups end round 2 like so: Group1: ClrA Group2: FtrA, FtrB Group4: WizA, RogB Group6: ClrB, RogA Group7: WizB I think the paradigm of "spread out for safety" applies equally well to the melee group system as to the map grid. Mages want to be as far away from melee fighters as possible, and no one wants to get swamped by multiple foes. Am I missing anything possibly important? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Removing combat distance and grids
Top