Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="billd91" data-source="post: 4929144" data-attributes="member: 3400">I'm not going to say that the Skill Training feat was a bad idea. It certainly wasn't and was long overdue to come out of WotC, if you ask me. Though, for those of us DMs who are accustomed to tweaking classes at player requests (as the DMG even addresses), trading a class skill out to make diplomacy a class skill was simplicity itself. No feat was required.But I wouldn't say that WotC "hides" the feat options. They have a feat index available on-line. They weren't hiding any particular content. They may not have explicitly publicized all of the options buried away in books, but that won't change with 4e. They may have told people to wait for PH2 for the druid, bard, and barbarian, but then those were particularly high profile omissions from 4e's initial offering. What else did they omit from 4e's initial books that people might have wanted? Are they going to receive the same level of publicity as the druid, barbarian, and bard? I don't think so.</blockquote>