Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Removing MAD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sadrik" data-source="post: 4702724" data-attributes="member: 14506"><p>Really now, this is simply a pairing down of needed stats for classes to open up more options for them so they are not so one-dimensional during character creation. What choices do you really have? Lets see... place my 16 or 18 in my primary and place my 14 or 16 in my secondary add racial mods and - done. </p><p></p><p>It might make the most sense to base everything off of their primary stat alone, in this case you are more free to make a smart rogue or a charismatic rogue or a strong rogue or whatever. Hm, this actually makes the most sense to me. It hearkens back to previous editions.</p><p></p><p></p><p>So I guess there are two schools of thought here. </p><p>1) Make more abilities important for every class so they limit their overall options to those in which they have a good stat in.</p><p>2) Make a single ability (or two) important and base all of the classes features off of that. Opening up every option equally without a - this power is sub-par for you because you dont have X stat high enough to make it effective.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Does this throw out the baby with the bath water though? Everyone will still have a high stat in their you might as well make the attack bonus based on that too. Giving everyone a normalized to hit chance will diminish the prime stat in favor of the secondary one. This will lower overall damage and could cause the secondary stat to bloat above the primary. I am unsure about this. However I do like it conceptually. </p><p></p><p>To add to your idea though:</p><p>Rather than give it based off of a normalized stat give it based off the HP they gain. So a wizard gets a Combat score of 4 rogue 5 and fighter 6. I don't know something to think about.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I prefer to actually like to have ideas to back up my gripes so I don't come off as nonsensically griping and others saying their is no gripe. I usually explicitly explain the issue in my posts and I do want feedback on my ideas as well as myself giving feedback on others ideas about the highlighted issue being tackled.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sadrik, post: 4702724, member: 14506"] Really now, this is simply a pairing down of needed stats for classes to open up more options for them so they are not so one-dimensional during character creation. What choices do you really have? Lets see... place my 16 or 18 in my primary and place my 14 or 16 in my secondary add racial mods and - done. It might make the most sense to base everything off of their primary stat alone, in this case you are more free to make a smart rogue or a charismatic rogue or a strong rogue or whatever. Hm, this actually makes the most sense to me. It hearkens back to previous editions. So I guess there are two schools of thought here. 1) Make more abilities important for every class so they limit their overall options to those in which they have a good stat in. 2) Make a single ability (or two) important and base all of the classes features off of that. Opening up every option equally without a - this power is sub-par for you because you dont have X stat high enough to make it effective. Does this throw out the baby with the bath water though? Everyone will still have a high stat in their you might as well make the attack bonus based on that too. Giving everyone a normalized to hit chance will diminish the prime stat in favor of the secondary one. This will lower overall damage and could cause the secondary stat to bloat above the primary. I am unsure about this. However I do like it conceptually. To add to your idea though: Rather than give it based off of a normalized stat give it based off the HP they gain. So a wizard gets a Combat score of 4 rogue 5 and fighter 6. I don't know something to think about. I prefer to actually like to have ideas to back up my gripes so I don't come off as nonsensically griping and others saying their is no gripe. I usually explicitly explain the issue in my posts and I do want feedback on my ideas as well as myself giving feedback on others ideas about the highlighted issue being tackled. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Removing MAD
Top