Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Removing the bonus action - analysis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kryx" data-source="post: 7132035" data-attributes="member: 6670944"><p>You're suggesting alternate words than the OP is using. I'm here for legitimate discussion so don't take this as bashing, but your wording significantly muddies the waters by adding reserved words like 'action' or 'regular action' without reducing any of the abuse of OP's wording.</p><p></p><p>In that case OP's wording is significantly more clear.</p><p></p><p></p><p>What I meant is:</p><p>Action: dash</p><p>Rogue (with rewrite of cunning): dash</p><p>Monk (with rewrite of ki): dash</p><p>Revised Ranger (with rewrite): dash</p><p></p><p>From the giantitp thread these kind of repeated dashes coming from Multiclass is one of the main concerns with removing the bonus action. The more common case would be dipping Rogue 2 to get a free Dash/Disengage every turn without the bonus action cost.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>TWF is the worst martial fighting style of any of the main supported fighting styles in 5e. <a href="http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?525771-Mearls-Bonus-Action-Removal&p=22049838#post22049838" target="_blank">My post here</a> shows the damage numbers that show that TWF is doing ~84-89% (depending on class) of the damage expected of it. Often the same damage or less than Sword and Board.</p><p>It needs significant help. Removing the bonus action helps significantly for the Ranger, but that's not enough.</p><p>Though I caution us delving too deeply into TWF as that can add too many topics to the thread.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kryx, post: 7132035, member: 6670944"] You're suggesting alternate words than the OP is using. I'm here for legitimate discussion so don't take this as bashing, but your wording significantly muddies the waters by adding reserved words like 'action' or 'regular action' without reducing any of the abuse of OP's wording. In that case OP's wording is significantly more clear. What I meant is: Action: dash Rogue (with rewrite of cunning): dash Monk (with rewrite of ki): dash Revised Ranger (with rewrite): dash From the giantitp thread these kind of repeated dashes coming from Multiclass is one of the main concerns with removing the bonus action. The more common case would be dipping Rogue 2 to get a free Dash/Disengage every turn without the bonus action cost. TWF is the worst martial fighting style of any of the main supported fighting styles in 5e. [URL="http://www.giantitp.com/forums/showthread.php?525771-Mearls-Bonus-Action-Removal&p=22049838#post22049838"]My post here[/URL] shows the damage numbers that show that TWF is doing ~84-89% (depending on class) of the damage expected of it. Often the same damage or less than Sword and Board. It needs significant help. Removing the bonus action helps significantly for the Ranger, but that's not enough. Though I caution us delving too deeply into TWF as that can add too many topics to the thread. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Removing the bonus action - analysis
Top