Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Wiseblood" data-source="post: 7884027" data-attributes="member: 42437">Are you using monsters that are too tough too early? The PC’s damage output not keeping pace perhaps but their skilled play and defenses giving them the tools to survive and win? If that is the case The fights (individually) are then attrition based. It is no longer resource management.I have the problem of enemies going down too fast.Have you considered HP capping?I am currently considering it. ( Because HP are bloated.) I would cap based on Class+Race+Constitution. For instance Fighters cap at 50 HP. The Constitution SCORE raises the cap. (Fighter with 18 Con caps at 68). Then race can modify the cap. Elves + 0, Dwarves + 15, Orcs +10 and so on...The numbers above are just placeholders but Wizards would have a lower cap than fighters by a good bit. I currently also have higher damage for hazards like falling. I use a d10 per ten feet instead of a d6.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Wiseblood, post: 7884027, member: 42437"] Are you using monsters that are too tough too early? The PC’s damage output not keeping pace perhaps but their skilled play and defenses giving them the tools to survive and win? If that is the case The fights (individually) are then attrition based. It is no longer resource management. I have the problem of enemies going down too fast. Have you considered HP capping? I am currently considering it. ( Because HP are bloated.) I would cap based on Class+Race+Constitution. For instance Fighters cap at 50 HP. The Constitution SCORE raises the cap. (Fighter with 18 Con caps at 68). Then race can modify the cap. Elves + 0, Dwarves + 15, Orcs +10 and so on... The numbers above are just placeholders but Wizards would have a lower cap than fighters by a good bit. I currently also have higher damage for hazards like falling. I use a d10 per ten feet instead of a d6. [/QUOTE]

Verification