Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Removing the Once per Wedding Limit on Solemnization in Weddings in 5e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eldritch_Lord" data-source="post: 5868681" data-attributes="member: 52073"><p>Solemnization has <em>always</em> been defined as being between one male PC and one female PC, period. That's what the 1e DMG said, and that's good enough for me. Many male players play male PCs more than female PCs, so if you want to allow players to choose that lifestyle for their characters, they'll just use it for powergaming purposes.</p><p></p><p>And we haven’t taken this to its ultimate conclusion. You got male/male PC solemnization powergaming out there. How can we rule that full-party solemnization is illegal when you say that male/male PC solemnization is legal. What is it about the full party that’s different? Well, full-party solemnization wasn't allowed in 1e because it was considered unbalancing by Gygax's standards. But if we take his standards away in one case, what about the others? And what about animal companions for non-druids and ultimately what about undead minions for non-necromancers? What happens to role protection <em>then</em>? How can we disallow these things and at the same time have supplements allowing solemnization between two male PCs. You mark my words, this is just the beginning in a long downward slide in relation to all the things that we consider to be abhorrent.</p><p></p><p>[sblock]The previous paragraph written with apologies to <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/05/07/39152/robertson-child-molestation/" target="_blank">Pat Robertson</a>. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />[/sblock]</p><p></p><p></p><p>Absolutely not. I hate this MMO-ification of D&D, I really do. AoE solemnization is <em>completely</em> unrealistic. I mean, sure, it works in anime, where you can keep picking up partner after partner, but in AD&D you got <em>one</em> solemnized partner when you reached name level, in addition to your keep, your 2.5 followers and your dog--and that was <em>it</em>, and we were happy with it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eldritch_Lord, post: 5868681, member: 52073"] Solemnization has [I]always[/I] been defined as being between one male PC and one female PC, period. That's what the 1e DMG said, and that's good enough for me. Many male players play male PCs more than female PCs, so if you want to allow players to choose that lifestyle for their characters, they'll just use it for powergaming purposes. And we haven’t taken this to its ultimate conclusion. You got male/male PC solemnization powergaming out there. How can we rule that full-party solemnization is illegal when you say that male/male PC solemnization is legal. What is it about the full party that’s different? Well, full-party solemnization wasn't allowed in 1e because it was considered unbalancing by Gygax's standards. But if we take his standards away in one case, what about the others? And what about animal companions for non-druids and ultimately what about undead minions for non-necromancers? What happens to role protection [I]then[/I]? How can we disallow these things and at the same time have supplements allowing solemnization between two male PCs. You mark my words, this is just the beginning in a long downward slide in relation to all the things that we consider to be abhorrent. [sblock]The previous paragraph written with apologies to [url=http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/05/07/39152/robertson-child-molestation/]Pat Robertson[/url]. ;)[/sblock] Absolutely not. I hate this MMO-ification of D&D, I really do. AoE solemnization is [I]completely[/I] unrealistic. I mean, sure, it works in anime, where you can keep picking up partner after partner, but in AD&D you got [I]one[/I] solemnized partner when you reached name level, in addition to your keep, your 2.5 followers and your dog--and that was [I]it[/I], and we were happy with it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Removing the Once per Wedding Limit on Solemnization in Weddings in 5e
Top