Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tek2way" data-source="post: 2643647" data-attributes="member: 6376">Well, for me, four settings really stood out. Dragonlance, Eberron, Kingdoms of Kalamar, and Iron Heroes.Dragonlance reminded me of why I began gaming in the first place. The 3.x treatment is flawed, but evocative of that feeling anyway.Eberron presented a set of rules that made the setting truly unique. I love the setting, but some element of the setting keeps me from being happy enough with it to run it. Still, it made me rethink the way I've done things in-game.Kingdoms of Kalamar has a level of detail that still amazes me, and which I still want to get a chance to use.Finally, Iron Heroes had the greatest impact on my gaming. My current Dragonlance game is all-but an Iron Heroes game without the setting and classes (running a heavily modified version of D&amp;D, but one that my entire group thanks me for setting up, as it addressed their concerns regarding core D&amp;D).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tek2way, post: 2643647, member: 6376"] Well, for me, four settings really stood out. Dragonlance, Eberron, Kingdoms of Kalamar, and Iron Heroes. Dragonlance reminded me of why I began gaming in the first place. The 3.x treatment is flawed, but evocative of that feeling anyway. Eberron presented a set of rules that made the setting truly unique. I love the setting, but some element of the setting keeps me from being happy enough with it to run it. Still, it made me rethink the way I've done things in-game. Kingdoms of Kalamar has a level of detail that still amazes me, and which I still want to get a chance to use. Finally, Iron Heroes had the greatest impact on my gaming. My current Dragonlance game is all-but an Iron Heroes game without the setting and classes (running a heavily modified version of D&D, but one that my entire group thanks me for setting up, as it addressed their concerns regarding core D&D). [/QUOTE]

Verification