Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mhacdebhandia" data-source="post: 3355654" data-attributes="member: 18832">I have to admit that I have never seen the point of calling your setting &quot;Greyhawk&quot; if you're not using more setting information than what you find in those sources.For instance, the article &quot;Core Beliefs: Wee Jas&quot; talks about the fallen Suloise empire. While I guess in some ways it would be entertaining to take these names and make up whatever you like about them, I don't see how your setting is &quot;Greyhawk&quot; as opposed to &quot;a homebrew using some Greyhawk names&quot; if you don't go into extra setting information to determine what Veluna and Furyondy and the Free City of Greyhawk are supposed to be like - and if you're not using any of the locations of Greyhawk, it's really not Greyhawk you're playing in.So I guess I have a question: how do you make your games Greyhawk games as opposed to what Third Edition would call core D&amp;D games?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mhacdebhandia, post: 3355654, member: 18832"] I have to admit that I have never seen the point of calling your setting "Greyhawk" if you're not using more setting information than what you find in those sources. For instance, the article "Core Beliefs: Wee Jas" talks about the fallen Suloise empire. While I guess in some ways it would be entertaining to take these names and make up whatever you like about them, I don't see how your setting is "Greyhawk" as opposed to "a homebrew using some Greyhawk names" if you [b]don't[/b] go into extra setting information to determine what Veluna and Furyondy and the Free City of Greyhawk are supposed to be like - and if you're not using any of the locations of Greyhawk, it's [b]really[/b] not Greyhawk you're playing in. So I guess I have a question: how do you make your games [b]Greyhawk[/b] games as opposed to what Third Edition would call [b]core D&D[/b] games? [/QUOTE]

Verification