Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Reports and News from D&D XP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eyebeams" data-source="post: 3356301" data-attributes="member: 9225"><p>Actually, I haven't made any definitive statements about how D&D is doing at all. And there's no innuendo; Hasbro's last annual report for FY 2005 gives D&D little to no mention, and the 4thQ release doesn't mention D&D. <strong>As I said earlier,</strong> this may have to do with the presentation style and not relative earnings of the brand.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is too vague to parse. "The path D&D is treading?" Marketing will naturally change according to quarterly and annual results. I believe Mike Mearls mentioned even more frequent updates at R&D meetings. D&D will *never* have the same kind of marketing and releases from year to year.</p><p></p><p>I can't address your remark because I don't understand its substance. Are you saying D&D will have the same kind of ads? Release the same kind of products? Use the same rules? What are you saying, exactly?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>A strawman is a point that bears no relevance to the argument at hand. Since the argument at hand is about the "best year ever" claim, saying that discussing it is a strawman is by definition erroneous.</p><p></p><p>If Umbran would care to tell me why he brought up opinions about the honesty of folks at WotC when I didn't I can respond to your other issue.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, I'm just have no interest in the impossible task of definitively proving a negative. I also can't prove that invisible Martians don't control world governments or that Monte Cook isn't a robot, but that doesn't bother me much either. I'm sure you'll take this as a cop out; that's fine with me.</p><p></p><p>(I'm happy to discuss these things with people who do *not* demand proof of a negative, though.)</p><p></p><p>In fact, in a rational discussion the burden is on you to assert a positive claim -- and you have. You have asserted I have a secret grudge against D&D that I'm using "innuendo" to fulfill even though I sell compatible products, play my Monk/Rogue once a week, and Mike Mearls and I are friended to each other over on livejournal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eyebeams, post: 3356301, member: 9225"] Actually, I haven't made any definitive statements about how D&D is doing at all. And there's no innuendo; Hasbro's last annual report for FY 2005 gives D&D little to no mention, and the 4thQ release doesn't mention D&D. [B]As I said earlier,[/B] this may have to do with the presentation style and not relative earnings of the brand. This is too vague to parse. "The path D&D is treading?" Marketing will naturally change according to quarterly and annual results. I believe Mike Mearls mentioned even more frequent updates at R&D meetings. D&D will *never* have the same kind of marketing and releases from year to year. I can't address your remark because I don't understand its substance. Are you saying D&D will have the same kind of ads? Release the same kind of products? Use the same rules? What are you saying, exactly? A strawman is a point that bears no relevance to the argument at hand. Since the argument at hand is about the "best year ever" claim, saying that discussing it is a strawman is by definition erroneous. If Umbran would care to tell me why he brought up opinions about the honesty of folks at WotC when I didn't I can respond to your other issue. No, I'm just have no interest in the impossible task of definitively proving a negative. I also can't prove that invisible Martians don't control world governments or that Monte Cook isn't a robot, but that doesn't bother me much either. I'm sure you'll take this as a cop out; that's fine with me. (I'm happy to discuss these things with people who do *not* demand proof of a negative, though.) In fact, in a rational discussion the burden is on you to assert a positive claim -- and you have. You have asserted I have a secret grudge against D&D that I'm using "innuendo" to fulfill even though I sell compatible products, play my Monk/Rogue once a week, and Mike Mearls and I are friended to each other over on livejournal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Reports and News from D&D XP
Top