Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Request: Move the Optimization Section back into the General 5e Section
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6692139" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>Long ago, the general section was about 3e, and it thrived on optimization and character building threads (in addition to other kinds of threads). I am sure there were good reasons to change that, probably involving edition warring and 4e, but those times seem to have passed. I think it's time we returned to characters being discussed in the general 5e board. Here are some reasons why:</p><p></p><p>1) Nobody seems to even know the Optimization section exists anymore. I hear this comment a lot, on other message boards, that people are surprised to even hear EnWorld has any character build discussions. It's relegated to near the bottom of the section list, and posts there get very few comments. If a thread manages to sneak into the general board that is about character builds and optimization, it gets a lot more comments - a sign people want to talk about the topic, they just don't know it's even there in that other section.</p><p></p><p>2) Character discussions are relatively non-controversial. You don't see a whole lot of edition warring (at least, any more) in the character build conversations that take place these days (here or elsewhere). </p><p></p><p>3) Character build discussions fit the general 5e section theme. Character builds are about the rules and product of the game - rather than about a company making that game. These days a lot of discussion in the general section seems to revolve around companies (WOTC and Paizo) rather than the game itself - even though the section is "supposed" to be about the rules and products (according to the tag description of that section) more than the company that makes it or their competitor. It's just really nice to talk about people's characters, and how they use the rules to make those characters, and the products those rules are found in. This kind of topic seems well within the theme of a general 5e section - more so than even a lot of the current discussion in that section.</p><p></p><p>4) There seems to be little rhyme or reason between what stays or gets moved out of the general 5e section in terms of character builds. Right now easily a half-dozen threads could be arguably moved to the optimization section, and a bunch more to the house rules section. For example, just on the first page of that section I'd say all of these could arguably be moved to either the optimization or house rules section: Assassinate, Breaking the rules with Goodberries, Warlording the fighter, Spell Mastery, Transporting large unwilling creature, How to break 5e, Let's Tweak the Ranger, Rules for Moral, Dumb Question re: Ensnaring Strike. And I am not saying I want any moved, just that the line seems blurry. We could "clarify" the line more, but why do that? Isn't the point to discuss fun topics we like, and isn't allowing these things in the general 5e rules section about fun topics we like to discuss? I'd say all those topics add to the board as a whole, and so do the threads that get moved (for whatever reason) to the optimization section.</p><p></p><p>5) The character builds and optimization section is "supposed" to be builds for any game system, but it's not really even used that way any more by most users. Builds for discontinued games like 1e, 2e, and 4e, tend to get posted in the section about those games. Builds about 3e and Pathfinder tend to get posted in that section. The character builds and optimization section is already mostly just 5e rules discussions. Few even use it the way it's apparently intended (for all games) - and few are enforcing the rule to move builds from non-5e sections anyway. I fact, most threads that end up in that section seem to be moved to that section from the general 5e section by a mod - a sign again that people just don't know about that section, or know a thread being moved to that section is like a gulag for their thread and they hope some few see it in the general 5e section before it gets moved. It would be less work for the mods if they just were allowed where people seem to want them to be and post them most often anyway.</p><p></p><p>I say it's time to end the optimization section. Whatever purpose it once served, the message board as a whole is better served by allowing those kinds of posts back in the general 5e rules section.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6692139, member: 2525"] Long ago, the general section was about 3e, and it thrived on optimization and character building threads (in addition to other kinds of threads). I am sure there were good reasons to change that, probably involving edition warring and 4e, but those times seem to have passed. I think it's time we returned to characters being discussed in the general 5e board. Here are some reasons why: 1) Nobody seems to even know the Optimization section exists anymore. I hear this comment a lot, on other message boards, that people are surprised to even hear EnWorld has any character build discussions. It's relegated to near the bottom of the section list, and posts there get very few comments. If a thread manages to sneak into the general board that is about character builds and optimization, it gets a lot more comments - a sign people want to talk about the topic, they just don't know it's even there in that other section. 2) Character discussions are relatively non-controversial. You don't see a whole lot of edition warring (at least, any more) in the character build conversations that take place these days (here or elsewhere). 3) Character build discussions fit the general 5e section theme. Character builds are about the rules and product of the game - rather than about a company making that game. These days a lot of discussion in the general section seems to revolve around companies (WOTC and Paizo) rather than the game itself - even though the section is "supposed" to be about the rules and products (according to the tag description of that section) more than the company that makes it or their competitor. It's just really nice to talk about people's characters, and how they use the rules to make those characters, and the products those rules are found in. This kind of topic seems well within the theme of a general 5e section - more so than even a lot of the current discussion in that section. 4) There seems to be little rhyme or reason between what stays or gets moved out of the general 5e section in terms of character builds. Right now easily a half-dozen threads could be arguably moved to the optimization section, and a bunch more to the house rules section. For example, just on the first page of that section I'd say all of these could arguably be moved to either the optimization or house rules section: Assassinate, Breaking the rules with Goodberries, Warlording the fighter, Spell Mastery, Transporting large unwilling creature, How to break 5e, Let's Tweak the Ranger, Rules for Moral, Dumb Question re: Ensnaring Strike. And I am not saying I want any moved, just that the line seems blurry. We could "clarify" the line more, but why do that? Isn't the point to discuss fun topics we like, and isn't allowing these things in the general 5e rules section about fun topics we like to discuss? I'd say all those topics add to the board as a whole, and so do the threads that get moved (for whatever reason) to the optimization section. 5) The character builds and optimization section is "supposed" to be builds for any game system, but it's not really even used that way any more by most users. Builds for discontinued games like 1e, 2e, and 4e, tend to get posted in the section about those games. Builds about 3e and Pathfinder tend to get posted in that section. The character builds and optimization section is already mostly just 5e rules discussions. Few even use it the way it's apparently intended (for all games) - and few are enforcing the rule to move builds from non-5e sections anyway. I fact, most threads that end up in that section seem to be moved to that section from the general 5e section by a mod - a sign again that people just don't know about that section, or know a thread being moved to that section is like a gulag for their thread and they hope some few see it in the general 5e section before it gets moved. It would be less work for the mods if they just were allowed where people seem to want them to be and post them most often anyway. I say it's time to end the optimization section. Whatever purpose it once served, the message board as a whole is better served by allowing those kinds of posts back in the general 5e rules section. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Request: Move the Optimization Section back into the General 5e Section
Top