Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 4377498" data-attributes="member: 12731">So, the answer is "no". At least thank you for responding.Furthermore, I guess I should assume by the lack of answers that the question about turning off smilies per default is "no" too?At least, that's the conclusion I got from the none-too-friendly mod message I got from trying to get my other answer answered by breaking it out from this thread, where it wasn't addressed at all.I can't do a proper quote, but here it is:My reply is:"I am sorry you believe I am a spammer. I was merely trying to increase the visibility of a question I thought had drowned in the other thread (this thread). Apparently my unforgivable mistake was trying to ask two questions in one thread, and then splitting the threads. Possibly my other mistake was using the tool I thought appropriate for the job: the new fork button.I sincerely acted in good faith, but what did I get for that? My thread closed, and myself asked to not spam threads? All in a tone I definitely don't care for...It is possible "fork" means something special to you, but it sure doesn't to me. If you do not wish the fork tool to be used, perhaps you should explain better for what you do want it to be used.And by the way, would it have hurt to have added a simple "no, we don't have a way to turn off smilies by default"...? "</blockquote>