Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[request/rant] To all reviewers, amateur and pro...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhimsyTheFae" data-source="post: 2692663" data-attributes="member: 8964"><p>***Before I respond, I want to state that I am not questioning your integrity, but am stating my opinion as advice and why I have this opinion. Also, I can see that by placing this on a public forum I am inviting others to question your work and for that I do apologize as it is not my intent.***</p><p></p><p>Whether or not you include the information shouldn't matter (heck a reviewer could lie about how he received the product), but it does. Basically, I may not judge your review any differently, but what I see is this:</p><p></p><p>1) Review states nothing of how product was obtained.</p><p></p><p>2) Review guidelines state that you should include how the product was obtained.</p><p></p><p>3) I find out later that it was free from the publisher.</p><p></p><p>4) Is there a conflict of interest, a payoff or just a gift and nothing else.</p><p></p><p>If you state up front how you received the product, I will think - well, he may be getting paid off, but he at least he came out and said it, so he doesn't appear to have anything to hide. It isn't anything personal Crothian, but I have been burned by omission in the past. So, I am becoming a jaded and cynical consumer.</p><p></p><p>Do I think that you should include that information? Yes.</p><p></p><p>Do I think that your motives are shady for not including it? No, it appears that you want to make the review "more" neutral so that people don't think about how you received the product when analyzing your review. It only becomes an issue when someone finds out how you received the product and begins to question why you would keep that from us.</p><p></p><p>It shouldn't affect the message of your review, but it does alter perception and that is all that many have to go on.</p><p></p><p>Note: Through my life, I have been a fairly unquestioning and admittedly gullible person. I have often read people's rants about how you should never take things at face value, should always question the validity of stuff and so on. I would alternately laugh at the paranoia of some people or be ashamed at my gullibility. It wasn't until being burned many times by the lies of others (many lies of omission) that I have become more jaded (I am still probably too unquestioning).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhimsyTheFae, post: 2692663, member: 8964"] ***Before I respond, I want to state that I am not questioning your integrity, but am stating my opinion as advice and why I have this opinion. Also, I can see that by placing this on a public forum I am inviting others to question your work and for that I do apologize as it is not my intent.*** Whether or not you include the information shouldn't matter (heck a reviewer could lie about how he received the product), but it does. Basically, I may not judge your review any differently, but what I see is this: 1) Review states nothing of how product was obtained. 2) Review guidelines state that you should include how the product was obtained. 3) I find out later that it was free from the publisher. 4) Is there a conflict of interest, a payoff or just a gift and nothing else. If you state up front how you received the product, I will think - well, he may be getting paid off, but he at least he came out and said it, so he doesn't appear to have anything to hide. It isn't anything personal Crothian, but I have been burned by omission in the past. So, I am becoming a jaded and cynical consumer. Do I think that you should include that information? Yes. Do I think that your motives are shady for not including it? No, it appears that you want to make the review "more" neutral so that people don't think about how you received the product when analyzing your review. It only becomes an issue when someone finds out how you received the product and begins to question why you would keep that from us. It shouldn't affect the message of your review, but it does alter perception and that is all that many have to go on. Note: Through my life, I have been a fairly unquestioning and admittedly gullible person. I have often read people's rants about how you should never take things at face value, should always question the validity of stuff and so on. I would alternately laugh at the paranoia of some people or be ashamed at my gullibility. It wasn't until being burned many times by the lies of others (many lies of omission) that I have become more jaded (I am still probably too unquestioning). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[request/rant] To all reviewers, amateur and pro...
Top