Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crothian" data-source="post: 2693156" data-attributes="member: 232">If you want to know if you can take a reviewer seriously, read their reviews.  Start a thread asking about the reviewer.  Does gamign for 25 years make me better a reviewer then someone that gamed for 5?  I doin't think so.  For somepeople the fact that I own and play a variety of systems makes me better to review things but to others it doesn't.  Listing credentials is not a bad idea, but in the end there is not a heck of a lot that is there that will let people know who is a good reviewer or not.  Or perhaps what people think makes a good reviewer is differrnt then me.  What I need to know about a reviewer I pick up in reading thier reviews.  I don't see what in a reviewers bio that would lend credibility to their reviews unless they have worked in the industry.  But then people that work in the industry that do reviews get the label of bias lots of times.  For the record I've never had anything published.  So, what credentials would make a good reviewer?  And that question is for everyone.</blockquote>