Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[request/rant] To all reviewers, amateur and pro...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nothing to see here" data-source="post: 2695531" data-attributes="member: 16432"><p>Every review has bias. The very act of reviewing is a subjective practice. If there was a uniform measurable code of quality we wouldnt need reviewers. </p><p></p><p>Compare two popular Olympic Sports...say the 100 meter sprint to figure skating. Which sport has more controversy over who actually wins...why it's the on with the french judge holding up the "9.7". Conversely, despiste whatever doping scandals are out there -- you don't need a 1-10 scale to determine who wins the 100 meters.</p><p></p><p>Since every review is based in bias -- the viewer has to take a caveat emptor kind of approach to the value of each review. An exhaustive background check on the motives and mechanics of a given reviewer might succeed in ferreting about the fanboys, scam artsts and malcontents but will still leave a massive number of points of view from the many, many reviewers that remain. It's worth noting however that whether or not you RECEIVE a free copy has no bearing on a reviewers credabilty. in and of itself. It would be a more productive use of time to invetigate publishers and their criteria for who they SEND a review copy too.</p><p></p><p>Among the reviewers that remain, a case can be made that depth of experience, provides a great frame of reference for assessing relative quality. Therefore on a general level, the more you review the 'better' you are. This requires the reader of a review to at least partially share the criteria of the reviewer. This, of course, is no guarantee.</p><p></p><p>The only way for an invididual to reliaby depend on a given reviewer is to, over the course of time compare a reviewers opinion on a variety of materials to their own. On these boards for instance, I find Psion's reviews most closely match my opinions of the books I've read -- I therefore tend to pay particular attention to his review - regardless of the how, why's and wear's he obtained the original product.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nothing to see here, post: 2695531, member: 16432"] Every review has bias. The very act of reviewing is a subjective practice. If there was a uniform measurable code of quality we wouldnt need reviewers. Compare two popular Olympic Sports...say the 100 meter sprint to figure skating. Which sport has more controversy over who actually wins...why it's the on with the french judge holding up the "9.7". Conversely, despiste whatever doping scandals are out there -- you don't need a 1-10 scale to determine who wins the 100 meters. Since every review is based in bias -- the viewer has to take a caveat emptor kind of approach to the value of each review. An exhaustive background check on the motives and mechanics of a given reviewer might succeed in ferreting about the fanboys, scam artsts and malcontents but will still leave a massive number of points of view from the many, many reviewers that remain. It's worth noting however that whether or not you RECEIVE a free copy has no bearing on a reviewers credabilty. in and of itself. It would be a more productive use of time to invetigate publishers and their criteria for who they SEND a review copy too. Among the reviewers that remain, a case can be made that depth of experience, provides a great frame of reference for assessing relative quality. Therefore on a general level, the more you review the 'better' you are. This requires the reader of a review to at least partially share the criteria of the reviewer. This, of course, is no guarantee. The only way for an invididual to reliaby depend on a given reviewer is to, over the course of time compare a reviewers opinion on a variety of materials to their own. On these boards for instance, I find Psion's reviews most closely match my opinions of the books I've read -- I therefore tend to pay particular attention to his review - regardless of the how, why's and wear's he obtained the original product. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[request/rant] To all reviewers, amateur and pro...
Top