Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Requesting input on Arena PBP format
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Entropi" data-source="post: 4858025" data-attributes="member: 68849"><p>Under this format, I wouldn't be booting anybody. There would not be a 'leaderboard' or any other impetus for competition - the competition would simply be to see how high your team can go (3 consecutive losses = mandatory retirement, which I didn't mention in the original post). So really, if you cheat you would only be cheating yourself.</p><p></p><p>This format (players Pitlording their own PCs) is similar to the Game of the Week on the CivFanatics forum for the computer game Civilization IV. Each week a game file is posted with a custom map and starting point, along with any special rules or restrictions for that week's challenge, and each player downloads and plays it, then posts his experiences. You can enter the editor, restart, or cheat in any number of ways, but you are only cheating yourself. The fun is to play the challenge as intended and see how you fare. It's not a competitive thing. It's a fun thing. 2 and 3 could be more competitive formats but with this format I would play down the competitive element as much as possible.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I like it! On first glance, I don't see any disadvantage to it compared to my 2 and 3. Unless I end up going with 1, I'll probably use your proposal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Entropi, post: 4858025, member: 68849"] Under this format, I wouldn't be booting anybody. There would not be a 'leaderboard' or any other impetus for competition - the competition would simply be to see how high your team can go (3 consecutive losses = mandatory retirement, which I didn't mention in the original post). So really, if you cheat you would only be cheating yourself. This format (players Pitlording their own PCs) is similar to the Game of the Week on the CivFanatics forum for the computer game Civilization IV. Each week a game file is posted with a custom map and starting point, along with any special rules or restrictions for that week's challenge, and each player downloads and plays it, then posts his experiences. You can enter the editor, restart, or cheat in any number of ways, but you are only cheating yourself. The fun is to play the challenge as intended and see how you fare. It's not a competitive thing. It's a fun thing. 2 and 3 could be more competitive formats but with this format I would play down the competitive element as much as possible. I like it! On first glance, I don't see any disadvantage to it compared to my 2 and 3. Unless I end up going with 1, I'll probably use your proposal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Requesting input on Arena PBP format
Top