Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BlivetWidget" data-source="post: 7634741" data-attributes="member: 6912801"><p>As hard as you're trying to be "right on the internet", nobody in this thread is confused about the DnD mechanical implementation of proficiency.  We're trying to discuss what it would even mean for someone to devote their life to being a math professor, being good at it, and somehow never becoming skilled at math.  As others have rightly pointed out, it's a bit nonsensical.  That's the premise of this entire thread, in fact, so I can't discern what sets you off against my comments in particular.  If you don't like the idea of inherent class features, you may as well get angry that wizards have predefined numbers of spell slots and complain that it holds you back from playing a very specific, suboptimal, theorycrafted wizard you dreamed up that you feel has more flavor than the wizard-as-described in DnD lore.</p></blockquote><p></p>