Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Requirements for the perfect character sheet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jeffh" data-source="post: 2592226" data-attributes="member: 2642"><p>"What's your favorite character sheet" discussions come up here fairly often - in fact, there's one going on right now. But one thing I haven't seen much of is specifics as to how a sheet could be better or what the ideal sheet would be like. Running a heavily house-ruled game as I am doing, I have had to think about this a fair bit lately.</p><p></p><p>To get started, here are a few of my likes and dislikes about the two dozen or so d20 System (mostly D&D) sheets I've seen.</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Use readable fonts. A bit of pseudo-medieval feel can be nice, but being able to tell - ideally at a distance or upside-down - what the flippin' text actually <strong>says </strong>trumps all such considerations.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Don't assume every character will have exactly one class! This extremely common, totally boneheaded error shows up as tiny spaces for class & level, "hit die" spaces that only leave room for one type (and come to think of it, that's a pretty useless thing to include anyway), single checkboxes for a skill's class or cross-class status, and so on.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Leave blanks. I use a lot of house-rules, and if I were designing a sheet I would thing "Y'know, with the advent of Unearthed Arcana and the proliferation of not-quite-D&D d20 games, it's safe to assume not every member of my audience plays by the same rules. So I'll at least give them some damn "notes" sections or something so they can fill in other stats besides the default D&D ones!"</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Skills section - this seems to be the easiest to screw up. Too many sheets suffer from one of two opposite problems - assuming you're using all and only the default D&D skills and thus giving NO space for additional ones, or leaving the skills entirely blank and making you fill in <strong>everything </strong>yourself. I completely disagree with ForceUser's comments in the other thread - at a <strong>minimum</strong>, the skills that can be used untrained should be pre-written. There should be several blank spaces for additional skills - at least three if all the skills are written in ahead of time, and at least ten if not, preferably lots more.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Two other skill-related annoyances, besides the above checkbox problem. First, there should be space for more than one miscellaneous mod per skill. As early as second level, it is possible to have race, feats, masterwork tools and synergy all giving modifiers. Secondly, while listing all the Knowledge fields is nice (especially if you follow up with at least one additional blank line), it is NOT necessary to devote that much room to Craft, Profession or Perform. Space for two or three types of each is plenty; there is no need for the six to eight Profession lines some sheets give, and don't even get me started on the one I saw that attempted an exhaustive list of them!</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Give enough room for feats!</strong> Preferably with space left over for short descriptions of what at least some of them do. How even a mid-level fighter is supposed to get the <strong>names </strong>of all their feats, much less any additional information, into the 2" x 2" space some designers seem to think is adequate is beyond me.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">(But <strong>don't</strong> try to list every feat a character could have in a checklist format, as one inexplicably popular sheet does. Inevitrably, the selection you end up with will work for exactly one campaign - yours. Other DMs won't necessarily make the same choices.)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It's nice if there are clear spaces for all the magic item slots.</li> </ul><p></p><p>I'll leave off there, though I could probably think of a few more. What are <em>other</em> people's likes and dislikes for character sheets?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jeffh, post: 2592226, member: 2642"] "What's your favorite character sheet" discussions come up here fairly often - in fact, there's one going on right now. But one thing I haven't seen much of is specifics as to how a sheet could be better or what the ideal sheet would be like. Running a heavily house-ruled game as I am doing, I have had to think about this a fair bit lately. To get started, here are a few of my likes and dislikes about the two dozen or so d20 System (mostly D&D) sheets I've seen. [list][*]Use readable fonts. A bit of pseudo-medieval feel can be nice, but being able to tell - ideally at a distance or upside-down - what the flippin' text actually [B]says [/B]trumps all such considerations. [*]Don't assume every character will have exactly one class! This extremely common, totally boneheaded error shows up as tiny spaces for class & level, "hit die" spaces that only leave room for one type (and come to think of it, that's a pretty useless thing to include anyway), single checkboxes for a skill's class or cross-class status, and so on. [*]Leave blanks. I use a lot of house-rules, and if I were designing a sheet I would thing "Y'know, with the advent of Unearthed Arcana and the proliferation of not-quite-D&D d20 games, it's safe to assume not every member of my audience plays by the same rules. So I'll at least give them some damn "notes" sections or something so they can fill in other stats besides the default D&D ones!" [*]Skills section - this seems to be the easiest to screw up. Too many sheets suffer from one of two opposite problems - assuming you're using all and only the default D&D skills and thus giving NO space for additional ones, or leaving the skills entirely blank and making you fill in [B]everything [/B]yourself. I completely disagree with ForceUser's comments in the other thread - at a [B]minimum[/B], the skills that can be used untrained should be pre-written. There should be several blank spaces for additional skills - at least three if all the skills are written in ahead of time, and at least ten if not, preferably lots more. [*]Two other skill-related annoyances, besides the above checkbox problem. First, there should be space for more than one miscellaneous mod per skill. As early as second level, it is possible to have race, feats, masterwork tools and synergy all giving modifiers. Secondly, while listing all the Knowledge fields is nice (especially if you follow up with at least one additional blank line), it is NOT necessary to devote that much room to Craft, Profession or Perform. Space for two or three types of each is plenty; there is no need for the six to eight Profession lines some sheets give, and don't even get me started on the one I saw that attempted an exhaustive list of them! [*][B]Give enough room for feats![/B] Preferably with space left over for short descriptions of what at least some of them do. How even a mid-level fighter is supposed to get the [B]names [/B]of all their feats, much less any additional information, into the 2" x 2" space some designers seem to think is adequate is beyond me. [*](But [B]don't[/B] try to list every feat a character could have in a checklist format, as one inexplicably popular sheet does. Inevitrably, the selection you end up with will work for exactly one campaign - yours. Other DMs won't necessarily make the same choices.) [*]It's nice if there are clear spaces for all the magic item slots.[/list] I'll leave off there, though I could probably think of a few more. What are [I]other[/I] people's likes and dislikes for character sheets? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Requirements for the perfect character sheet
Top