Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8431308" data-attributes="member: 7032025">The module has a plot. You modified that plot, but there was still a plot (the proof is right there in the fact that there were two attacks planned and decided to have only one). So, how do you reconciliate this with your grandiose statements that "I don't have a plot that has to be roughly followed".And this is just focussing on one point of the plot, again, looking at your summaries, they follow the structure of the module which I published, so there was a plot, and you used it. True or false ?Just answer this please, without spouting pages of nonsense about your theories, I don't care about those, seeing that despite your theories, your summaries of games are actually vast fights where you ignore most of the rules for the rule of cool. That in itself is not a problem at all, but it goes to show that all your theories stay totally theoretical, and that, in practice, and all your pretense about "I don't have a plot that has to be roughly followed" is just hot wind. So can you please come down your pedestal of self-righteousness ?</blockquote>