Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Respect Mah Authoritah: Thoughts on DM and Player Authority in 5e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 8436375" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>Here is what your thoughts above are missing:</p><p></p><p>Let us say that at the apex of the "fiat decision tree" (lets call it), I have a creative menu of 1000 possible items. Complete GM fiat (no constraints, no boundaries, no player say and no system say...ALL GM SAY).</p><p></p><p>1) We have a constraining premise of play.</p><p></p><p>That creative menu of 1000 possible items is now winnowed to 200 items.</p><p></p><p>2) We have table-facing and transparent machinery which further winnows a GM's decision-tree (I can't choose framing and action resolution results and consequences that are violations of this stuff).</p><p></p><p>That creative menu of 200 possible items is now winnowed to 50 items.</p><p></p><p>3) I have player-authored Quests, Theme, Paragon Path, Epic Destinies and prior fiction which all must be honored as the volitional force of play.</p><p></p><p>That creative menu of 50 possible items is now winnowed down to 25 items.</p><p></p><p>4) I have a game with clear principles (cut to the action, fail forward, follow the fiction and change the situation based on goal of conflict) and tools/techniques for those principles to integrate with all of the stuff above.</p><p></p><p>That creative menu of 25 possible items is now winnowed down to 5 items.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is BS math, but that is the reality of it. In any given instance of play, your GMing decision-tree (in situation framing and in consequence adjudication is going to be dramatically winnowed down from MAXIMUM FIAT because of all of the constraining factors of the system which winnow your cognitive workspace and focus your creativity to a handful (ish) of "play-honoring framing and outcomes." </p><p></p><p>You then just follow that stuff and keep play orbiting around Quests/Themes/Paths/Destinies.</p><p></p><p>Its simple. </p><p></p><p>And its HARD to do the opposite (impose metaplot despite all of the decision-tree constraining/winnowing aspects of system).</p><p></p><p>So...again...why would you?</p><p></p><p>There are games that make it very easy to impose metaplot and consistently situate play in that MAXIMUM GM FIAT space. 4e isn't one of them. So play one of those games (this is where edition warriors say YEAH I KNOW WE DID)!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 8436375, member: 6696971"] Here is what your thoughts above are missing: Let us say that at the apex of the "fiat decision tree" (lets call it), I have a creative menu of 1000 possible items. Complete GM fiat (no constraints, no boundaries, no player say and no system say...ALL GM SAY). 1) We have a constraining premise of play. That creative menu of 1000 possible items is now winnowed to 200 items. 2) We have table-facing and transparent machinery which further winnows a GM's decision-tree (I can't choose framing and action resolution results and consequences that are violations of this stuff). That creative menu of 200 possible items is now winnowed to 50 items. 3) I have player-authored Quests, Theme, Paragon Path, Epic Destinies and prior fiction which all must be honored as the volitional force of play. That creative menu of 50 possible items is now winnowed down to 25 items. 4) I have a game with clear principles (cut to the action, fail forward, follow the fiction and change the situation based on goal of conflict) and tools/techniques for those principles to integrate with all of the stuff above. That creative menu of 25 possible items is now winnowed down to 5 items. That is BS math, but that is the reality of it. In any given instance of play, your GMing decision-tree (in situation framing and in consequence adjudication is going to be dramatically winnowed down from MAXIMUM FIAT because of all of the constraining factors of the system which winnow your cognitive workspace and focus your creativity to a handful (ish) of "play-honoring framing and outcomes." You then just follow that stuff and keep play orbiting around Quests/Themes/Paths/Destinies. Its simple. And its HARD to do the opposite (impose metaplot despite all of the decision-tree constraining/winnowing aspects of system). So...again...why would you? There are games that make it very easy to impose metaplot and consistently situate play in that MAXIMUM GM FIAT space. 4e isn't one of them. So play one of those games (this is where edition warriors say YEAH I KNOW WE DID)! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Respect Mah Authoritah: Thoughts on DM and Player Authority in 5e
Top