Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Respect Mah Authoritah: Thoughts on DM and Player Authority in 5e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 8438399" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Here is another post to try and describe the difference between "situation first" and "backstory first" RPGing. That distinction does not correlate in any strict sense to "story now" and <something else>. Situation first <em>can </em>be railroading (eg the D&D-as-living-novel approach that Lewis Pulsipher criticised back in the late 70s/early 80s). And the most paradigmatic form of "backstory first" is a Gygax or Moldvay-style dungeon, which when run as they (especially Moldvay) advise will not be a railroad. (But the flip side of that - related to my reply to [USER=7025508]@Crimson Longinus[/USER] in post 1156 just upthread - is that it might be boring, if the players get unlucky and miss the interesting bits of the dungeon.)</p><p></p><p><em>Situation first </em>need not eschew the use of maps. In my Classic Traveller game I've used some map in our past several sessions - deck plans, and plans of an ancient alien installation. But the use of the plans is different from "backstory first". Not <em>utterly different</em>, but different.</p><p></p><p>I will explain with reference to <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/classic-traveller-actual-play-annic-nova-meets-alien.669484/" target="_blank">this session</a>. The PCs board and explore an alien vessel. Much of the play, particularly in the earlier part of the session, looks a bit like a dungeon crawl: the players say where their PCs go, and I say what they see.</p><p></p><p>The difference is in the way the map feeds into scene framing and action resolution. The fact that we know, from the "free narration" phase of play, <em>where </em>the various PCs are when the Alien attacks gives me licence to frame scenes that establish and maintain the unfolding drama. If you read the play report, you can see that we are not counting squares on a map and correlating that with movement rates to work out time elapsed. Rather, I am making decisions - using my authority over scene-framing - as to who is in which scene. Those decisions have to respect the established fiction - ie our shared knowledge of <em>who is where - </em>but they are not outputs of an action resolution process. They are authorial decisions, made by me, that pick up what was just colour (<em>Tony's on the bridge;</em> <em>Vincenzo and Alissa are in the hydroponics room</em>) into scenes (<em>Vincenzo and Alissa are attacked by an Alien in the hydroponics room, and Tony can't help them because he's on the bridge!</em>).</p><p></p><p>It's worth expressly noting that adopting a situation-first generates its own, new, demands on action resolution mechanics. Eg what happens if Tony, under attack from an Alien, yells into his communicator calling for help; and Blaster's player declares <em>I rush to help him</em>? We need a way to resolve this action - in the fiction, <em>does Blaster get there in time?</em> and in the real world <em>can Blaster's player insert Blaster into the scene? </em>In Burning Wheel this would probably be a Speed check; in Prince Valiant it would be Brawn + Agility; in Apocalypse World it seems like it might be Acting Under Fire. What about Classic Traveller? It's less clear - Traveller is not as robust a resolution engine as those other systems, and some extrapolation or improvisation might be needed: perhaps a throw of 8+ if the distance is not too great, with bonuses for high STR and/or Tactics or Recon.</p><p></p><p>One consequence of this difference in the use of the map - situation-first rather than backstory-first - is that there is no risk of "offscreen" failure. PCs getting to where the action is does not depend on counting squares and keeping track of time elapsed as a result of movement. </p><p></p><p>(<a href="http://www.indie-rpgs.com/articles/3/" target="_blank">Here</a> is a classic illustration of the reverse approach, where scenes are framed by first applying map-and-key to resolve declared movement actions:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The time to traverse town with super-running is deemed insufficient to arrive at the scene, with reference to distance and actions at the scene, such that the villain's bomb does blow up the city. (The rules for DC Heroes specifically dictate that this be the appropriate way to GM such a scene).)</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 8438399, member: 42582"] Here is another post to try and describe the difference between "situation first" and "backstory first" RPGing. That distinction does not correlate in any strict sense to "story now" and <something else>. Situation first [I]can [/I]be railroading (eg the D&D-as-living-novel approach that Lewis Pulsipher criticised back in the late 70s/early 80s). And the most paradigmatic form of "backstory first" is a Gygax or Moldvay-style dungeon, which when run as they (especially Moldvay) advise will not be a railroad. (But the flip side of that - related to my reply to [USER=7025508]@Crimson Longinus[/USER] in post 1156 just upthread - is that it might be boring, if the players get unlucky and miss the interesting bits of the dungeon.) [I]Situation first [/I]need not eschew the use of maps. In my Classic Traveller game I've used some map in our past several sessions - deck plans, and plans of an ancient alien installation. But the use of the plans is different from "backstory first". Not [I]utterly different[/I], but different. I will explain with reference to [url=https://www.enworld.org/threads/classic-traveller-actual-play-annic-nova-meets-alien.669484/]this session[/url]. The PCs board and explore an alien vessel. Much of the play, particularly in the earlier part of the session, looks a bit like a dungeon crawl: the players say where their PCs go, and I say what they see. The difference is in the way the map feeds into scene framing and action resolution. The fact that we know, from the "free narration" phase of play, [I]where [/I]the various PCs are when the Alien attacks gives me licence to frame scenes that establish and maintain the unfolding drama. If you read the play report, you can see that we are not counting squares on a map and correlating that with movement rates to work out time elapsed. Rather, I am making decisions - using my authority over scene-framing - as to who is in which scene. Those decisions have to respect the established fiction - ie our shared knowledge of [I]who is where - [/I]but they are not outputs of an action resolution process. They are authorial decisions, made by me, that pick up what was just colour ([I]Tony's on the bridge;[/I] [I]Vincenzo and Alissa are in the hydroponics room[/I]) into scenes ([I]Vincenzo and Alissa are attacked by an Alien in the hydroponics room, and Tony can't help them because he's on the bridge![/I]). It's worth expressly noting that adopting a situation-first generates its own, new, demands on action resolution mechanics. Eg what happens if Tony, under attack from an Alien, yells into his communicator calling for help; and Blaster's player declares [I]I rush to help him[/I]? We need a way to resolve this action - in the fiction, [I]does Blaster get there in time?[/I] and in the real world [I]can Blaster's player insert Blaster into the scene? [/I]In Burning Wheel this would probably be a Speed check; in Prince Valiant it would be Brawn + Agility; in Apocalypse World it seems like it might be Acting Under Fire. What about Classic Traveller? It's less clear - Traveller is not as robust a resolution engine as those other systems, and some extrapolation or improvisation might be needed: perhaps a throw of 8+ if the distance is not too great, with bonuses for high STR and/or Tactics or Recon. One consequence of this difference in the use of the map - situation-first rather than backstory-first - is that there is no risk of "offscreen" failure. PCs getting to where the action is does not depend on counting squares and keeping track of time elapsed as a result of movement. ([url=http://www.indie-rpgs.com/articles/3/]Here[/url] is a classic illustration of the reverse approach, where scenes are framed by first applying map-and-key to resolve declared movement actions: [LIST] [*]The time to traverse town with super-running is deemed insufficient to arrive at the scene, with reference to distance and actions at the scene, such that the villain's bomb does blow up the city. (The rules for DC Heroes specifically dictate that this be the appropriate way to GM such a scene).) [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Respect Mah Authoritah: Thoughts on DM and Player Authority in 5e
Top