Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 8440367" data-attributes="member: 6795602">I have limited time this morning.  But I have a good response to this part.A mix of backstory or procedural generation as the need arises.  I think I explained that in my post (looks like you left off the relevant bit).Also there's this - In an infinite world (or one that approaches an infinite one) 'everything' is in the world.  So what becomes most important isn't how the world is generated, but what the players focus on in the world.  Having their characters do things and having the GM narrate the results.That (a)-(d) are descriptive of a living sandbox didn't mean they are prescriptive of one.  I only claimed that those 4 criteria are true of living sandboxes - not that they were only true of living sandboxes.  So I agree, I wouldn't describe those games as living sandboxes - although they do appear to share those 4 criteria in common.  Getting to your question - there are numerous methods in sandbox play to resolve PC actions.</blockquote>