Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Respect Mah Authoritah: Thoughts on DM and Player Authority in 5e
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Helpful NPC Thom" data-source="post: 8440715" data-attributes="member: 7031378"><p>[USER=6795602]@FrogReaver[/USER], if the game doesn't list principles but instead relies on the GM to come up with those principles, there aren't really any principles at all. [USER=6785785]@hawkeyefan[/USER] (edit: misattributed to [USER=5142]@Aldarc[/USER], my apologies--has explained this in quite a bit of depth while I was writing out my own post, but I'll chime in nonetheless.</p><p></p><p>D&D has never explicitly called out principles the way PbtA games do. Snagging from the Dungeon World SRD, there are two main concepts that D&D lacks: Agenda and Principles. The Agenda is the GM's goal. In Dungeon World, the GM's "job" is to:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Make the world fantastic</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Fill the characters' lives with adventure</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Play to find out what happens</li> </ul><p>The text explicitly says the following:</p><p></p><p></p><p>In D&D 5e, I'd say that the GM's principles are similar, save for the last bit. I believe "create enjoyable combat encounters" and "challenge the characters and the players" would replace the final bullet point, but your perspective may differ.</p><p></p><p>In Dungeon World, the GM's principles are thus:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Draw maps, leave blanks</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Address the characters, not the players</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Embrace the fantastic</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Make a move that follows</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Never speak the name of your move</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Give every monster life</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Name every person</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Ask questions and use the answers</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Be a fan of the characters</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Think Dangerous</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Begin and end with the fiction</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Think offscreen, too</li> </ul><p>The purpose of principles is to establish how the GM runs the game. Actions that are aligned with those principles are greenlit; those contrary to them are not. These principles are all largely compatible with 5e, but I'd alter a few slightly ("ask questions and use the answers" is inappropriate), and I'd add "consult the dice when uncertain" and "balance risk and reward." At least, that's how I view the designers' intent.</p><p></p><p>The problem within 5e is that everything is wishy-washy in terms of the non-combat or spell mechanics. There's no procedure or rules of play to guide the GM's hand. Without an Agenda or Principles, the GM is left to determine his own. Flexibility is a strength and weakness of 5e because D&D is in many ways formless; the rules have a structure, but because the game isn't designed for one particular use, it takes on the shape of the vessel into which it is poured...sort of.</p><p></p><p>Dungeon World is designed for high-action fantasy adventure. It tells the GM how to accomplish this with its Agenda and Principles. D&D has always lacked these elements, and it has never provided cohesive guidelines on how to run the game to accomplish the purpose of the game. What is the point of 5e? The point of 3e was a streamlined version of AD&D 2e that implemented character customization and tactical options. The point of 4e was to balance 3e around the tactical combat elements. The point of 5e is to...well, I suspect it was to appeal to the fanbase that had originally left for Pathfinder while remaining accessible to a wide audience.</p><p></p><p>The rules don't tell the GM how to do any of that, though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Helpful NPC Thom, post: 8440715, member: 7031378"] [USER=6795602]@FrogReaver[/USER], if the game doesn't list principles but instead relies on the GM to come up with those principles, there aren't really any principles at all. [USER=6785785]@hawkeyefan[/USER] (edit: misattributed to [USER=5142]@Aldarc[/USER], my apologies--has explained this in quite a bit of depth while I was writing out my own post, but I'll chime in nonetheless. D&D has never explicitly called out principles the way PbtA games do. Snagging from the Dungeon World SRD, there are two main concepts that D&D lacks: Agenda and Principles. The Agenda is the GM's goal. In Dungeon World, the GM's "job" is to: [LIST] [*]Make the world fantastic [*]Fill the characters' lives with adventure [*]Play to find out what happens [/LIST] The text explicitly says the following: In D&D 5e, I'd say that the GM's principles are similar, save for the last bit. I believe "create enjoyable combat encounters" and "challenge the characters and the players" would replace the final bullet point, but your perspective may differ. In Dungeon World, the GM's principles are thus: [LIST] [*]Draw maps, leave blanks [*]Address the characters, not the players [*]Embrace the fantastic [*]Make a move that follows [*]Never speak the name of your move [*]Give every monster life [*]Name every person [*]Ask questions and use the answers [*]Be a fan of the characters [*]Think Dangerous [*]Begin and end with the fiction [*]Think offscreen, too [/LIST] The purpose of principles is to establish how the GM runs the game. Actions that are aligned with those principles are greenlit; those contrary to them are not. These principles are all largely compatible with 5e, but I'd alter a few slightly ("ask questions and use the answers" is inappropriate), and I'd add "consult the dice when uncertain" and "balance risk and reward." At least, that's how I view the designers' intent. The problem within 5e is that everything is wishy-washy in terms of the non-combat or spell mechanics. There's no procedure or rules of play to guide the GM's hand. Without an Agenda or Principles, the GM is left to determine his own. Flexibility is a strength and weakness of 5e because D&D is in many ways formless; the rules have a structure, but because the game isn't designed for one particular use, it takes on the shape of the vessel into which it is poured...sort of. Dungeon World is designed for high-action fantasy adventure. It tells the GM how to accomplish this with its Agenda and Principles. D&D has always lacked these elements, and it has never provided cohesive guidelines on how to run the game to accomplish the purpose of the game. What is the point of 5e? The point of 3e was a streamlined version of AD&D 2e that implemented character customization and tactical options. The point of 4e was to balance 3e around the tactical combat elements. The point of 5e is to...well, I suspect it was to appeal to the fanbase that had originally left for Pathfinder while remaining accessible to a wide audience. The rules don't tell the GM how to do any of that, though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Respect Mah Authoritah: Thoughts on DM and Player Authority in 5e
Top