Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Response to Woas about HARP
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rasyr" data-source="post: 1855767" data-attributes="member: 2855"><p>Ok, first of all, spells are divided into Spheres (each profession has its own Sphere), and each Sphere is a list of individual spells that a character may learn.</p><p></p><p>Each spell is then learned as if it were a skill. With the character purchasing ranks in it. In order to cast a spell, the character must have enough power points (PP) available, and must have enough ranks in the spell.</p><p></p><p>A character may only put an amount of power points into a spell equal to the number of ranks he has. For example, a Mage wants to cast an Elemental Bolt of Fire (Firebolt). The base form of this spell does a Tiny Fire Critical, and has a range of 100' for a cost of 4 power points.</p><p></p><p>This means that the character needs a minimum of 4 skill ranks in the spell to be able to cast it. The character may scale up the size of the critical by paying an additional 2 PP per size increase. He may also scale it up in terms of range by an additional 50' for every additional 1 PP. </p><p></p><p>At first level, a character may have a maximum of 6 ranks in any given skill, so a Mage could cast the Firebolt a total of 200' and do a Tiny Fire Critical, or cast it 100' and do a Small Fire Critical.</p><p></p><p>There is a catch though. For every power point above the base cost of the spell, the mage receives a -5 to his casting roll. Thus both scaled up examples listed above are at -10 to cast.</p><p></p><p>So, if maxed out on skill ranks, and the character had a +5 bonus for both the related stats, this would give him a total bonus of 40 for casting the spell, or 30 if casting either of the scaled up options listed above. If the mage wanted to do a Tiny Fire Critical, and only give it a range of 150', then this would cost him 5 PP total, and give him a casting bonus of 35 for this spell.</p><p></p><p>In HARP, mages can also wear armor, however, the wearing of armor hampers the casting of spells, and thus requires that the caster expend more power points when casting a spell. If our Mage is wearing soft leather armor (which give a +20 to their defensive bonus), this would also require that all spells cost an extra 2 PP. In this case, the Mage would not be able to scale up the spell while wearing armor since to cast the base form would cost 6 PP (and thus require a minimum of 6 ranks in the spell). And yes, his casting bonus would be 30 while wearing the armor since it is 2 PP above the base cost of the spell.</p><p></p><p>I hope that makes sense.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Several other systems have, including the Action! system. However, I personally feel that WotC was the only company (except perhaps White Wolf maybe) who had the customer base to support such a move.</p><p></p><p>Any other company that released their systems under the OGL is going to find that doing so will draw off some of their own customers without enough of a return to make it worthwhile. And since most rpg companies are already struggling (do to decreased distributor sales - which are down across the board), doing so is not really feasible. </p><p></p><p>Now, ICE has no plans on releasing HARP under the OGL. However, ICE is very willing to license the system, at what I think are very reasonable rates, and to work with licensors so that doing so does not strap them. In fact, ICE has already received several requests regarding licensing of HARP, which is very cool, I think. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rasyr, post: 1855767, member: 2855"] Ok, first of all, spells are divided into Spheres (each profession has its own Sphere), and each Sphere is a list of individual spells that a character may learn. Each spell is then learned as if it were a skill. With the character purchasing ranks in it. In order to cast a spell, the character must have enough power points (PP) available, and must have enough ranks in the spell. A character may only put an amount of power points into a spell equal to the number of ranks he has. For example, a Mage wants to cast an Elemental Bolt of Fire (Firebolt). The base form of this spell does a Tiny Fire Critical, and has a range of 100' for a cost of 4 power points. This means that the character needs a minimum of 4 skill ranks in the spell to be able to cast it. The character may scale up the size of the critical by paying an additional 2 PP per size increase. He may also scale it up in terms of range by an additional 50' for every additional 1 PP. At first level, a character may have a maximum of 6 ranks in any given skill, so a Mage could cast the Firebolt a total of 200' and do a Tiny Fire Critical, or cast it 100' and do a Small Fire Critical. There is a catch though. For every power point above the base cost of the spell, the mage receives a -5 to his casting roll. Thus both scaled up examples listed above are at -10 to cast. So, if maxed out on skill ranks, and the character had a +5 bonus for both the related stats, this would give him a total bonus of 40 for casting the spell, or 30 if casting either of the scaled up options listed above. If the mage wanted to do a Tiny Fire Critical, and only give it a range of 150', then this would cost him 5 PP total, and give him a casting bonus of 35 for this spell. In HARP, mages can also wear armor, however, the wearing of armor hampers the casting of spells, and thus requires that the caster expend more power points when casting a spell. If our Mage is wearing soft leather armor (which give a +20 to their defensive bonus), this would also require that all spells cost an extra 2 PP. In this case, the Mage would not be able to scale up the spell while wearing armor since to cast the base form would cost 6 PP (and thus require a minimum of 6 ranks in the spell). And yes, his casting bonus would be 30 while wearing the armor since it is 2 PP above the base cost of the spell. I hope that makes sense. Several other systems have, including the Action! system. However, I personally feel that WotC was the only company (except perhaps White Wolf maybe) who had the customer base to support such a move. Any other company that released their systems under the OGL is going to find that doing so will draw off some of their own customers without enough of a return to make it worthwhile. And since most rpg companies are already struggling (do to decreased distributor sales - which are down across the board), doing so is not really feasible. Now, ICE has no plans on releasing HARP under the OGL. However, ICE is very willing to license the system, at what I think are very reasonable rates, and to work with licensors so that doing so does not strap them. In fact, ICE has already received several requests regarding licensing of HARP, which is very cool, I think. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Response to Woas about HARP
Top