Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Resting and the frikkin' Elephant in the Room
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 7188655" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>The thing is, D&D doesn't have a single setting. So, the mechanics have to be applicable to a broad swath of settings. So, the mechanics are largely setting agnostic. Even the backgrounds in the PHB aren't really doing much lifting for world building. Yup, my character is an Acolyte. Sure... and that means what exactly? Do people treat him differently? Does that affect his relationships with other people? Does it affect his disposition or personality? What does that actually mean? </p><p></p><p>Well, the system is largely silent on the issue and it's left to the table to run with that. Fair enough. I have no problems with that.</p><p></p><p>Now, think of Vampire:The Masquerade. My choice of vampire clan has enormous implications on the entire campaign. Whether I'm Ventrue or Malkavian, this is going to affect every single scenario we play in. Of course, Vampire has the advantage of only having one setting and the game is built for that setting. So, it becomes a lot easier to tie world building elements into the mechanics.</p><p></p><p>For D&D though, because the system is largely setting agnostic, settings generally don't follow logically from the system. There is exactly one published setting (at least from TSR/WotC) that was built with an eye on the mechanics and that's Eberron. All the other settings were built and then the system bolted on top with honking big lampshades thrown over the inconsistencies.</p><p></p><p>Stop and think about random encounter tables for a moment. Say we've got a 1 in 12 chance rolled every 4 hours. That's 6 checks per day. Or, roughly a 50% chance per day (yes, I know it's not 50%, but, it's close enough for this). That means anyone traveling for 2 days or more is most likely going to bump something that wants to eat them.</p><p></p><p>Sure, I'll buy that in something like Darksun or Ravenloft. But, that's insanely dangerous anywhere else. How would you even get a society started if the world was that dangerous? No one can travel more than 15 miles without being killed? Because, remember, this is world building time. This applies to ALL NPC'S. Not just PC's. EVERYONE. It's a ridiculous world.</p><p></p><p>But, we'd use those random tables any time in game and not even blink.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 7188655, member: 22779"] The thing is, D&D doesn't have a single setting. So, the mechanics have to be applicable to a broad swath of settings. So, the mechanics are largely setting agnostic. Even the backgrounds in the PHB aren't really doing much lifting for world building. Yup, my character is an Acolyte. Sure... and that means what exactly? Do people treat him differently? Does that affect his relationships with other people? Does it affect his disposition or personality? What does that actually mean? Well, the system is largely silent on the issue and it's left to the table to run with that. Fair enough. I have no problems with that. Now, think of Vampire:The Masquerade. My choice of vampire clan has enormous implications on the entire campaign. Whether I'm Ventrue or Malkavian, this is going to affect every single scenario we play in. Of course, Vampire has the advantage of only having one setting and the game is built for that setting. So, it becomes a lot easier to tie world building elements into the mechanics. For D&D though, because the system is largely setting agnostic, settings generally don't follow logically from the system. There is exactly one published setting (at least from TSR/WotC) that was built with an eye on the mechanics and that's Eberron. All the other settings were built and then the system bolted on top with honking big lampshades thrown over the inconsistencies. Stop and think about random encounter tables for a moment. Say we've got a 1 in 12 chance rolled every 4 hours. That's 6 checks per day. Or, roughly a 50% chance per day (yes, I know it's not 50%, but, it's close enough for this). That means anyone traveling for 2 days or more is most likely going to bump something that wants to eat them. Sure, I'll buy that in something like Darksun or Ravenloft. But, that's insanely dangerous anywhere else. How would you even get a society started if the world was that dangerous? No one can travel more than 15 miles without being killed? Because, remember, this is world building time. This applies to ALL NPC'S. Not just PC's. EVERYONE. It's a ridiculous world. But, we'd use those random tables any time in game and not even blink. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Resting and the frikkin' Elephant in the Room
Top