Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Resting and the frikkin' Elephant in the Room
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 7189224" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>Sorry, no, never said you <em>can't</em> or even shouldn't do worldbuilding in D&D. Of course you can. </p><p></p><p>Thing is, the worldbuilding you do is largely independent of the mechanics. </p><p></p><p>Which has been my point all the way along. Just because the PC's meet 3 Deadly/Day encounters does not in any way shape or form mean that monsters only travel in Deadly groups. It only means that your PC's meet Deadly groups because, you, the DM, have decided on that pacing. It has ZERO impact on the rest of the world.</p><p></p><p>It's only when you try to force adventure building mechanics (which is precisely what the pacing, or XP/Day guidelines are) onto a larger world implication that you have problems. Once you realize that adventure building mechanics are entirely divorced from world building concerns, all your inconsistencies vanish.</p><p></p><p>IOW, just because your PC's meet two vampires, does not mean that vampires are common in the setting. It could very well be that they met the only two vampires in the entire setting. Unlikely, but, possible. Now, as I argued previously, you shouldn't be static with your encounter/day paradigm anyway. It's predictable and no fun. One day you might meet 3 deadlies and the next day you meet 7 Easies. Whatever. Mix it up.</p><p></p><p>But, at no point does that have any implications on the larger world. The fact that D&D game worlds have almost all been built first and then mechanics laid overtop pretty much shows the path here. Other than Eberron, none of the settings were built based on the mechanics. Because, quite frankly, the mechanics first model leads to very inconsistent settings.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why? Why are we assuming mechanics are used at all? The DM simply rules the results and moves on. There's no engagement with the mechanical side of the game whatsoever. If I want that farmer to get eaten by the wolf, or the farmer to have a nice new wolf pelt jacket, it's got nothing to do with mechanics.</p><p></p><p>There is zero assumption of mechanical resolution here. The mechanics apply to the PC's and the PC's ONLY.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 7189224, member: 22779"] Sorry, no, never said you [I]can't[/I] or even shouldn't do worldbuilding in D&D. Of course you can. Thing is, the worldbuilding you do is largely independent of the mechanics. Which has been my point all the way along. Just because the PC's meet 3 Deadly/Day encounters does not in any way shape or form mean that monsters only travel in Deadly groups. It only means that your PC's meet Deadly groups because, you, the DM, have decided on that pacing. It has ZERO impact on the rest of the world. It's only when you try to force adventure building mechanics (which is precisely what the pacing, or XP/Day guidelines are) onto a larger world implication that you have problems. Once you realize that adventure building mechanics are entirely divorced from world building concerns, all your inconsistencies vanish. IOW, just because your PC's meet two vampires, does not mean that vampires are common in the setting. It could very well be that they met the only two vampires in the entire setting. Unlikely, but, possible. Now, as I argued previously, you shouldn't be static with your encounter/day paradigm anyway. It's predictable and no fun. One day you might meet 3 deadlies and the next day you meet 7 Easies. Whatever. Mix it up. But, at no point does that have any implications on the larger world. The fact that D&D game worlds have almost all been built first and then mechanics laid overtop pretty much shows the path here. Other than Eberron, none of the settings were built based on the mechanics. Because, quite frankly, the mechanics first model leads to very inconsistent settings. Why? Why are we assuming mechanics are used at all? The DM simply rules the results and moves on. There's no engagement with the mechanical side of the game whatsoever. If I want that farmer to get eaten by the wolf, or the farmer to have a nice new wolf pelt jacket, it's got nothing to do with mechanics. There is zero assumption of mechanical resolution here. The mechanics apply to the PC's and the PC's ONLY. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Resting and the frikkin' Elephant in the Room
Top