Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Resting and the frikkin' Elephant in the Room
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 7190584" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>I would expect that any published adventure that incorporates travel as a significant part of the adventure would have encounter expectations that make sense for the area of travel. Like in Out of the Abyss, the PCs are fleeing through a demon infested Underdark....so the travel is very dangerous. </p><p></p><p>In Princes of the Apocalypse, the Dessarin Valley is described as a wilderness where creatures are common. It provides random encounter guidelines and tables. Interestingly, it has a table for Early Encounters and then a table for Later Encounters. The second includes more dangerous encounters in order to better challenge PCs as they gain levels. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, and the Barrow-Wight. But all of that is along the road from the Shire to Bree, right? Outside of the actual Shire. </p><p></p><p>And interestingly enough, for the most part, the road from the Shire to Bree would be perfectly safe for just about any travelers. It's dangerous for the Hobbits, though....kind of a different rules for PCs type of thing. Obviously, there is an explanation in the story for this....but that's something a DM can come up with in his game, if he feels he needs to justify the reason for the PCs having encounters. Things were different for Tolkien's main characters than for the background characters (based on the monster attractor you mentioned, mostly).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, but I'm talking about skipping travel through non-dangerous areas. Travel in dangerous areas would not seem to pose a problem for the encounter expectations. For those who think that multiple encounter days, or multiple deadly encounter days break the verisimilitude of their world, they should not have such days in areas they don't want to be considered dangerous. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not really. The examples you gave are all outside the Shire. The only encounters taking place in the Shire are the few Hobbits who encounter the Ringwraiths asking after Frodo. Oh, and the scouring of the Shire after the end of the last book. </p><p></p><p>But I would expect most of us would view those as anomalies rather than as cause to change up a Shire Encounter Table to make it a very dangerous area.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 7190584, member: 6785785"] I would expect that any published adventure that incorporates travel as a significant part of the adventure would have encounter expectations that make sense for the area of travel. Like in Out of the Abyss, the PCs are fleeing through a demon infested Underdark....so the travel is very dangerous. In Princes of the Apocalypse, the Dessarin Valley is described as a wilderness where creatures are common. It provides random encounter guidelines and tables. Interestingly, it has a table for Early Encounters and then a table for Later Encounters. The second includes more dangerous encounters in order to better challenge PCs as they gain levels. Sure, and the Barrow-Wight. But all of that is along the road from the Shire to Bree, right? Outside of the actual Shire. And interestingly enough, for the most part, the road from the Shire to Bree would be perfectly safe for just about any travelers. It's dangerous for the Hobbits, though....kind of a different rules for PCs type of thing. Obviously, there is an explanation in the story for this....but that's something a DM can come up with in his game, if he feels he needs to justify the reason for the PCs having encounters. Things were different for Tolkien's main characters than for the background characters (based on the monster attractor you mentioned, mostly). Sure, but I'm talking about skipping travel through non-dangerous areas. Travel in dangerous areas would not seem to pose a problem for the encounter expectations. For those who think that multiple encounter days, or multiple deadly encounter days break the verisimilitude of their world, they should not have such days in areas they don't want to be considered dangerous. Not really. The examples you gave are all outside the Shire. The only encounters taking place in the Shire are the few Hobbits who encounter the Ringwraiths asking after Frodo. Oh, and the scouring of the Shire after the end of the last book. But I would expect most of us would view those as anomalies rather than as cause to change up a Shire Encounter Table to make it a very dangerous area. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Resting and the frikkin' Elephant in the Room
Top