Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7200391" data-attributes="member: 16814">Well, if your point is that you don't have to do anything, I suppose you're correct.  If you tell the players there's just no there there, then... well... okay, but why talk about anything in game then?As I've said, it appears we don't actually disagree in how we play, and you seem okay with agreeing with Tony when he says  the same thing I did (and when he diesnt, so, grain of salt).  The only point really appears that your of the adamant opinion nothing has to happen in order to play the game.  I can't disagree, it's just a strange absolute endpoint that essentially justifies anything as a choice.  Not super helpful, but also not wrong.Not sure that you can go from "not a problem for me" to "the problem is exaggerated" without a healthy dose of superiority.  You're been DMing a bit, and seem to have a good handle on your game.  Me, too.  But I distinctly recall a point I wasn't, and resting was an issue I had back in 3.x.  maybe you've been good the whole time, but not everyone is awesome at it yet or gas had the realizations you've had.  Or, the could just be playing in a more player focused story where the DM has less decision power on resting.  Still, not your problem doesn't mean others are making it up or exaggerating their problems</blockquote>