Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cheshire_grin" data-source="post: 4972935" data-attributes="member: 54244">1. The spell would fail, I would rule without granting any additional information.2. I believe Resurrection and True Resurrection would both remove the effects of a domination, since they remove other conditions such as disease, poison, paralyzation, undeath, being disintegrated, etc.3. Aside from casting divinations themselves, or if they thought to take fingerprints before the elves were captured, I can't think of any way they could discern the identities of the fingers' true owners.Note the following caveat from the Resurrection spell's text: the portion receiving the spell must have been part of the creature’s body at the time of death. If the elves' fingers were cut off before they were killed, (assuming they were the actual fingers) then they cannot be used to resurrect the elves in any case.True Resurrection would not suffer this limitation, since it doesn't need a part of the body at all.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cheshire_grin, post: 4972935, member: 54244"] 1. The spell would fail, I would rule without granting any additional information. 2. I believe Resurrection and True Resurrection would both remove the effects of a domination, since they remove other conditions such as disease, poison, paralyzation, undeath, being disintegrated, etc. 3. Aside from casting divinations themselves, or if they thought to take fingerprints before the elves were captured, I can't think of any way they could discern the identities of the fingers' true owners. Note the following caveat from the Resurrection spell's text: [b]the portion receiving the spell must have been part of the creature’s body at the time of death[/b]. If the elves' fingers were cut off before they were killed, (assuming they were the actual fingers) then they cannot be used to resurrect the elves in any case. True Resurrection would not suffer this limitation, since it doesn't need a part of the body at all. [/QUOTE]

Verification