Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rethinking alignment yet again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 8693684" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>So it is true that for the most part there is a clear answer to the Trolley Problem for each of the nine alignments in D&D. And what a player should do is have some clear understanding of what he wants to explore with respect to a character that answers the Trolley Problem in a particular way, even if that character has a very different answer than their own. They should clarify with the DM if they have some question how a particular alignment addresses the Trolley Problem, and then play that alignment. And what will happen in game is that there will be external game RP as characters with different takes on the Trolley Problem face the Trolley Problem and there will hopefully in good harmonious functional RP around debating the Trolley Problem from the standpoint of the characters.</p><p></p><p>Really advanced RP happens when the player imagining the character with a ready answer to the Trolley Problem decides that based on RP the character himself decides that his own read answers were maybe incorrect, or that the player decides the character decides for whatever reason to against his own beliefs and leans into that and you RP out either remorse and guilt or else epiphany and character transformation. </p><p></p><p>Now the problem you run into is players take their own biases about the Trolley problem into the game rather than the character's biases. And rather than RPing in a functional and mature manner, they get all offended that someone's character addresses the Trolley Problem differently than how they think it should be in real life and then you have antagonistic non-harmonious RP. But that's gonna happen with immature dysfunctional players whether you have alignment or not. </p><p></p><p>Now I can tell you right now how players that hate alignment want the Trolley Problem solved in game. They want it solved with "Whatever helps the party win. Stop worrying about moral predicaments and just metagame. Be practical. Be ruthless. Don't let the DM keep you from winning."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 8693684, member: 4937"] So it is true that for the most part there is a clear answer to the Trolley Problem for each of the nine alignments in D&D. And what a player should do is have some clear understanding of what he wants to explore with respect to a character that answers the Trolley Problem in a particular way, even if that character has a very different answer than their own. They should clarify with the DM if they have some question how a particular alignment addresses the Trolley Problem, and then play that alignment. And what will happen in game is that there will be external game RP as characters with different takes on the Trolley Problem face the Trolley Problem and there will hopefully in good harmonious functional RP around debating the Trolley Problem from the standpoint of the characters. Really advanced RP happens when the player imagining the character with a ready answer to the Trolley Problem decides that based on RP the character himself decides that his own read answers were maybe incorrect, or that the player decides the character decides for whatever reason to against his own beliefs and leans into that and you RP out either remorse and guilt or else epiphany and character transformation. Now the problem you run into is players take their own biases about the Trolley problem into the game rather than the character's biases. And rather than RPing in a functional and mature manner, they get all offended that someone's character addresses the Trolley Problem differently than how they think it should be in real life and then you have antagonistic non-harmonious RP. But that's gonna happen with immature dysfunctional players whether you have alignment or not. Now I can tell you right now how players that hate alignment want the Trolley Problem solved in game. They want it solved with "Whatever helps the party win. Stop worrying about moral predicaments and just metagame. Be practical. Be ruthless. Don't let the DM keep you from winning." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Rethinking alignment yet again
Top