Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rethinking Reflex and AC...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="breschau" data-source="post: 4095512" data-attributes="member: 52376"><p>According to <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/benimoto/2307597095/sizes/o/" target="_blank">this</a> photo from XP:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>At the far edge of the page is the shield text, the last bit is interesting:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The assumption was that shields only gave a bonus to Reflexes. Assuming shields grant a bonus to Reflex then heavy shields grant a +2 bonus, judging from the pregens.</p><p></p><p>If Small size is still +1, judging from the pregens we know that plate is then +7 AC (+1 size, +2 shield). It was assumed before that AC is Reflex Defense plus armor. Considering the above text, we know that's false.</p><p></p><p>Chainmail is therefore +6 AC (heavy armor = no bonus and no shield on the cleric, easy). But, scale is +7 AC (heavy armor = no bonus w/ +2 from shield, no size bonus).</p><p></p><p>The trouble is then that scale and plate would offer the same protection. When the plate text clearly stats that "plate provides the most armor protection." From the order of listing and text we can assume that they should offer more protection, in the order listed.</p><p></p><p>Chain +6, scale +7, plate +8 is what I think it will be.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: One of two assumptions must be true; either the size bonus was left off of the halfling's AC or size no longer offers an AC bonus. I think the former is far more likely.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="breschau, post: 4095512, member: 52376"] According to [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/benimoto/2307597095/sizes/o/]this[/url] photo from XP: At the far edge of the page is the shield text, the last bit is interesting: The assumption was that shields only gave a bonus to Reflexes. Assuming shields grant a bonus to Reflex then heavy shields grant a +2 bonus, judging from the pregens. If Small size is still +1, judging from the pregens we know that plate is then +7 AC (+1 size, +2 shield). It was assumed before that AC is Reflex Defense plus armor. Considering the above text, we know that's false. Chainmail is therefore +6 AC (heavy armor = no bonus and no shield on the cleric, easy). But, scale is +7 AC (heavy armor = no bonus w/ +2 from shield, no size bonus). The trouble is then that scale and plate would offer the same protection. When the plate text clearly stats that "plate provides the most armor protection." From the order of listing and text we can assume that they should offer more protection, in the order listed. Chain +6, scale +7, plate +8 is what I think it will be. EDIT: One of two assumptions must be true; either the size bonus was left off of the halfling's AC or size no longer offers an AC bonus. I think the former is far more likely. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Rethinking Reflex and AC...
Top