Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DeadlyUematsu" data-source="post: 9149989" data-attributes="member: 2677"><p>I too am a fan of 3.0e and I found the changes in attitude that erupted in 3.5e to be negative in the long run. A more conservative approach to introducing additional game components would have done great service to 3.X's reputation as a whole and right now, I only see very devoted powergamers sticking with 3.X and though the amount of work they've done in sifting through mass of options produced over the edition's life is commendable, players working with their DMs would have been a much more robust experience than enduring the (EXTREME) winners and losers by dart toss approach that all of the supplement production actually produced.</p></blockquote><p></p>