Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="-SIN-" data-source="post: 3813249" data-attributes="member: 50643">Firstly: Thank you for expressing a keen interest! All of you.Now onto answering questions...Cheshire_Grin - Cleric/Crusader/Ruby Knight Vindicator should be fine. Offhand I see no issues.Ambrus - I'll have to say no to playing an elemental, sorry. Raylis - Fighter going on Dwarven Defender is great!Mellub - Cleric or Fighter/Cleric is coolBootmobile - I'll have to say no to tiefling, a more mundane (elf, dark elf etc, etc) race would be ok though. As for skill tricks - I've never used them, if you care to explain them then I see no problems.Ancient History - Wizard/Warlock is cool. A dedicated caster is a must!James Heard - Swift Hunter (Ranger VA) - I see no problem, but I'd have to double check.Nazhkandrias - Dragon Shaman should be ok, but I'm not sure if a Kobold would work too well. There may well be an opportunity to use him, but not from the start. I'll leave it up to you. I don't know how long it may take before I could inject you into the game. As for Desert Environs - Just have it in your BG (i.e. your clan/tribe wandered further out than others)Creamsteak - Like you said, 8 peeps have shown interest but there are only 6 spaces so I'm going to have to cut a couple of you loose. The best concepts will get through.Strahd Von Zarovich - Goliath Barbarian sounds interesting. I like it and it fits well.HIT POINTS TO BE MAX'D. It's a 32 point build for a reason! Meh!Core Pantheon of Gods. It makes life easier for us all.Setting Details:I've got to be very brief at the moment (at work). It's just a generic setting - Grim and Gritty. It's bent more toward the older style of settings where the monsterous races are generally evil. I suppose it's more like FR than any other. At the moment you'll only be adventuring in, on and around Ironstorm, but there's lots to do (If it helps, think Undermountain/Mithral Hall). I've not established a homebrew and it WILL be based on what we all contribute, so do as you please, but don't go too far! Like I said, if you can make it sound plausable, go for it!It looks good so far, but I think maybe a few too many clerics. One main reason I left classes wide open is to try to encourage more martial classes as I know that playing a warrior can be quite limiting, hence why I've removed restrictions. The Book of 9 Swords has some pretty powerful, flavoursome classes - If we can find a decent balance, like a 2:1 (Warrior:Caster) I will probably say yes to a 9 player game. So that'd be 6 warriors, 3 casters - but I don't mean straight classes by any means. If the 6 warriors swapped out classes for a couple of levels in rogue, wizard or cleric, etc, that's fine. As long as their main role is as a warrior. But I'll leave it for you to decide. I may well go 'all out' and accept you all anyway - It's just combat that will slow things down some, but on the flip side there are some uber enemies, some of which I'm not even sure how you'd tackle! But I'll leave it for you to decide...</blockquote>

Verification