Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Returning to Pathfinder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="James Jacobs" data-source="post: 5720305" data-attributes="member: 23937"><p>Psionics are a tricky subject. The people who want psionics in Pathifnder the most, as far as I can tell, are overwhelmingly fans of the 3.5 Power Point system (or some variant).</p><p></p><p>I'm probably the BIGGEST fan of psioncis at Paizo, but I'm absolutely NOT a fan of the power point system. I much prefer psionic characters to use their magic more like how the sorcerer uses magic—a spontaneous but still Vancian system.</p><p></p><p>I'm pretty sure that a psionics book that presents a Pathfinder take on psionics but without using the power point system would aggravate and annoy the majority of those who want psionics, while those who don't particularly want psioncis would be difficult to convince to check out the new system in the first place, resulting in a book that lots of people would hate (either because they check it out and don't like it or because they don't and just assume they won't like it).</p><p></p><p>If we ever DO something with psionics, as a result, I'll be pushing hard for us to NOT call it psionics, but instead something else. Mind magic? Psychic magic? Mesmerisim? Anything other than psionics, so that we don't imply an "overwriting" of psionics as they're "supposed" to exist in the framework of Pathfinder. By calling it something else, such new rules would exist more "side by side" with Dreamscarred's work (or with the 3.5 rules, for that matter).</p><p></p><p>Now... all that said, we only put out 3 rulebooks a year, and traditionally, one of those is a bestiary-type book. Which means, at a rate of 2 books a year, we don't have a lot of opportunities to branch out into other topics, and so we have to be VERY careful and picky about what two rulebooks we do in a year. There's a HECK of a lot of competition for our attention, in other words, compounded by a growing desire at Paizo to go new ways with the game and not just mimic the release pattern of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd edition D&D books.</p><p></p><p>Anyway... a sort of round-about reply to answering "why hasn't Paizo done a psionics book/when will Paizo do a psionics book?" </p><p></p><p>To the OP: Welcome back! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="James Jacobs, post: 5720305, member: 23937"] Psionics are a tricky subject. The people who want psionics in Pathifnder the most, as far as I can tell, are overwhelmingly fans of the 3.5 Power Point system (or some variant). I'm probably the BIGGEST fan of psioncis at Paizo, but I'm absolutely NOT a fan of the power point system. I much prefer psionic characters to use their magic more like how the sorcerer uses magic—a spontaneous but still Vancian system. I'm pretty sure that a psionics book that presents a Pathfinder take on psionics but without using the power point system would aggravate and annoy the majority of those who want psionics, while those who don't particularly want psioncis would be difficult to convince to check out the new system in the first place, resulting in a book that lots of people would hate (either because they check it out and don't like it or because they don't and just assume they won't like it). If we ever DO something with psionics, as a result, I'll be pushing hard for us to NOT call it psionics, but instead something else. Mind magic? Psychic magic? Mesmerisim? Anything other than psionics, so that we don't imply an "overwriting" of psionics as they're "supposed" to exist in the framework of Pathfinder. By calling it something else, such new rules would exist more "side by side" with Dreamscarred's work (or with the 3.5 rules, for that matter). Now... all that said, we only put out 3 rulebooks a year, and traditionally, one of those is a bestiary-type book. Which means, at a rate of 2 books a year, we don't have a lot of opportunities to branch out into other topics, and so we have to be VERY careful and picky about what two rulebooks we do in a year. There's a HECK of a lot of competition for our attention, in other words, compounded by a growing desire at Paizo to go new ways with the game and not just mimic the release pattern of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd edition D&D books. Anyway... a sort of round-about reply to answering "why hasn't Paizo done a psionics book/when will Paizo do a psionics book?" To the OP: Welcome back! :-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Returning to Pathfinder
Top