Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Review inflation on ENworld
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 429384" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Ooh, my buttons are getting pushed <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>A thing like this does not increase <em>accuracy</em>. It increases <em>precision</em>. There's a difference.</p><p></p><p>Accuracy talks about how correct the number is, how well it reflects reality. Precision, in essence, talks about how many decimal places the measurement can realistically include.</p><p></p><p>A laser range finder can take measurements very precisely. It can always give you a number out to many decimal places. Your measurement may still be inaccurate if you use this very precise tool incorrectly (by saying you measured the width of a field when you actually measured it's length, for example).</p><p></p><p>There is no point to taking a measurement precisely if you aren't going to be very accurate anyway. That's the situation we have here. The rating system is subjective (since it's rating an opinion, and opinions are subjective). There's no "code" for how you give a rating. Unless everyones giving ratings in exactly the same way, for the same reasons, you're not getting a very accurate measurement. There's little point in going for high precision on it.</p><p></p><p>In other words, the ratings system is by it's nature very vague. Giving more info on the ratings is then not terribly useful. It actually then makes sense to keep the ratings vague, rather than giving percentile scores, or going to a 1 to 10 system. You actually have a greater chance of getting consistent accurate measurements if you give people less freedom of "false precision".</p><p></p><p>Also, how many ratings do most products get? Percentile scores are not particularly good if the number of scores is less than (you guessed it) 100 or so. If only 5 people rate a product, a percentile score is pretty meaningless. If there are many such products, and you weight for how many people actually rated the product, you now reduce many of the rating to statistical irrelevance. If you're throwing many of them away, what's the point of doing a percentile score in the first place?</p><p></p><p>In the end, it comes down to this - what do users want to get out of reviews? They want to know how good the product is. Percentile socres don't actually tell you that. They are a bit of statistical minutae that only tells you something about the products if their quality actually follows a normal distribution.</p><p></p><p>(edit: My typing and grammar are often rather inaccurate <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 429384, member: 177"] Ooh, my buttons are getting pushed :) A thing like this does not increase [i]accuracy[/i]. It increases [i]precision[/i]. There's a difference. Accuracy talks about how correct the number is, how well it reflects reality. Precision, in essence, talks about how many decimal places the measurement can realistically include. A laser range finder can take measurements very precisely. It can always give you a number out to many decimal places. Your measurement may still be inaccurate if you use this very precise tool incorrectly (by saying you measured the width of a field when you actually measured it's length, for example). There is no point to taking a measurement precisely if you aren't going to be very accurate anyway. That's the situation we have here. The rating system is subjective (since it's rating an opinion, and opinions are subjective). There's no "code" for how you give a rating. Unless everyones giving ratings in exactly the same way, for the same reasons, you're not getting a very accurate measurement. There's little point in going for high precision on it. In other words, the ratings system is by it's nature very vague. Giving more info on the ratings is then not terribly useful. It actually then makes sense to keep the ratings vague, rather than giving percentile scores, or going to a 1 to 10 system. You actually have a greater chance of getting consistent accurate measurements if you give people less freedom of "false precision". Also, how many ratings do most products get? Percentile scores are not particularly good if the number of scores is less than (you guessed it) 100 or so. If only 5 people rate a product, a percentile score is pretty meaningless. If there are many such products, and you weight for how many people actually rated the product, you now reduce many of the rating to statistical irrelevance. If you're throwing many of them away, what's the point of doing a percentile score in the first place? In the end, it comes down to this - what do users want to get out of reviews? They want to know how good the product is. Percentile socres don't actually tell you that. They are a bit of statistical minutae that only tells you something about the products if their quality actually follows a normal distribution. (edit: My typing and grammar are often rather inaccurate :)) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Review inflation on ENworld
Top