Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 1007884" data-attributes="member: 172">And you know, Spence, he was well justified each time he said something like that. As the saying goes, if the shoe fits...The classic argument here is WotC has a right to make money. Heck, I think I've said that many times myself.That said, if they are going to sell us something, they really need to sell us something worth buying. That is what I see as the fundamental point here. I agree with Monte on most of his assessements (the biggest exception being that I totally disagree with him on animal buff spells), and what it boils down to is that fundamentally too much of this book was not needed and/or was actually harmful to the state of the game, and there was too little there to justify a whole new purchase.Or perhaps, if you don't see how the criticism are justified, perhaps you are the one that is biased. I think Monte spends a fair amount of time considering what was authentically positive and needed, but the things that were unneeded and harmful are pretty hard to ignore.I disagree with your assessment of his review. I think he was spot on in most of his points.</blockquote>