Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Review of Monte's 3.5 Review...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wolv0rine" data-source="post: 999830" data-attributes="member: 9045"><p></p><p>*chuckles*</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is so basic it continues to astound me that noone seems to take it into consideration. We're ALL (everyone doing business at least) here to make money. The question is if we do it honorably or not. Many of us do, but I don't feel that WotC has made me feel that they are doing so honorably for quite a while. I'd say probably since being bought by Hasbro, sadly.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The innate problems with anything to which the answer is "Make it!" or "House-rule it!" is pretty simple. It's a matter of everyone playing (basically) the same game. And I think that's <strong>extremely</strong> important. If we're all playing D&D, the gamerules should be done well enough that we're all playing mostly the same game. House rules are good, and I'd never want to see them go away. But they shouldn't be needed to 'fix' the game, only alter it to taste. If the gamerules are such that most people feel the need to make house rules to "fix" thew game itself (not just tailor it), then we cease being able to talk amongst ourselves with the same frames of reference. And that's so sad.</p><p>Not that I disagree with your point. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See above. I agree with Monte on the weapon size issue though. A little common sense goes a long way. It's not beyond me to figure that halflings are smaller than humans, and thus a human longsword is pretty friggin big for a halfling. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p><strong>[/B/</strong></p><p><strong>This is an option, yes. And it's likely the only real option one has. But again, it goes back to my point above. Will I eventually buy the books? I hope so, if only so I'm familiar with the current state of the official rules, and can understand what people are talking about. It's like d20 Modern. Don't have it, don't know the rules. And I feel like an idiot every time d20 Modern comes up, and I'm completely lost in the conversation. If I were in that position with D&D itself... not a fun thought. So in effect, yes they ARE making us switch. We are not forced to buy the books (and we CAN go by the SRD alone, true), but it's a matter of everyone being on the same page, even if some of us change a few words in our copy.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wolv0rine, post: 999830, member: 9045"] [B][/B] *chuckles* [B][/B] This is so basic it continues to astound me that noone seems to take it into consideration. We're ALL (everyone doing business at least) here to make money. The question is if we do it honorably or not. Many of us do, but I don't feel that WotC has made me feel that they are doing so honorably for quite a while. I'd say probably since being bought by Hasbro, sadly. [B][/B] The innate problems with anything to which the answer is "Make it!" or "House-rule it!" is pretty simple. It's a matter of everyone playing (basically) the same game. And I think that's [b]extremely[/b] important. If we're all playing D&D, the gamerules should be done well enough that we're all playing mostly the same game. House rules are good, and I'd never want to see them go away. But they shouldn't be needed to 'fix' the game, only alter it to taste. If the gamerules are such that most people feel the need to make house rules to "fix" thew game itself (not just tailor it), then we cease being able to talk amongst ourselves with the same frames of reference. And that's so sad. Not that I disagree with your point. :) [B][/B] See above. I agree with Monte on the weapon size issue though. A little common sense goes a long way. It's not beyond me to figure that halflings are smaller than humans, and thus a human longsword is pretty friggin big for a halfling. :) [B][/B/ This is an option, yes. And it's likely the only real option one has. But again, it goes back to my point above. Will I eventually buy the books? I hope so, if only so I'm familiar with the current state of the official rules, and can understand what people are talking about. It's like d20 Modern. Don't have it, don't know the rules. And I feel like an idiot every time d20 Modern comes up, and I'm completely lost in the conversation. If I were in that position with D&D itself... not a fun thought. So in effect, yes they ARE making us switch. We are not forced to buy the books (and we CAN go by the SRD alone, true), but it's a matter of everyone being on the same page, even if some of us change a few words in our copy.[/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Review of Monte's 3.5 Review...
Top