Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="King_Stannis" data-source="post: 180883" data-attributes="member: 324">well, the only reason i kept defending my point was that many people that responded here seemed to have little or no problem with it. the tone of several responses was &quot;the fan material is good enough&quot;...another response (erroneously) thought that d&amp;d was the only rpg around now that got good adventure support.but you are right in one respect, it probably does no good bitching about it here....but then again, isn't that what the internet is for - bitching about stuff you can't really change! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />i'll state it again for (hopefully) the last time. the current licenseholder of the star wars roleplaying game refuses to publish quality adventures (save for T-F) for that game. i think that sucks, especially considering that the previous licenseholder, with few resources, was able to be very prolific in this area. i believe that quality adventure support is necessary for a rpg to survive and thrive.if you agree with the above statements, as it seems you might, then i don't think we've got a beef.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="King_Stannis, post: 180883, member: 324"] well, the only reason i kept defending my point was that many people that responded here seemed to have little or no problem with it. the tone of several responses was "the fan material is good enough"...another response (erroneously) thought that d&d was the only rpg around now that got good adventure support. but you are right in one respect, it probably does no good bitching about it here....but then again, isn't that what the internet is for - bitching about stuff you can't really change! ;) i'll state it again for (hopefully) the last time. the current licenseholder of the star wars roleplaying game refuses to publish quality adventures (save for T-F) for that game. i think that sucks, especially considering that the previous licenseholder, with few resources, was able to be very prolific in this area. i believe that quality adventure support is necessary for a rpg to survive and thrive. if you agree with the above statements, as it seems you might, then i don't think we've got a beef. [/QUOTE]

Verification