Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jaeger" data-source="post: 8187301" data-attributes="member: 27996">My aim would be to have a version that is between 5e an B/X in running complexity.But with more choices available to PC's during advancement.TSR managed to turn out gobs of material for B/X somehow. And who said the dedicated VTT would be free?There are plenty of issues in play with 5e that could use a second look.And streamline does not = simplify.That is one of the weaknesses of the system IMHO.D&amp;D needs 3-6 standard combat maneuvers/options that any PC can do. And they need no be complex multi roll affairs.Just viable tactics that can be better options in certain situations other than &quot;I hit him with my best attack&quot; over and over again.They need not add more complexity than what 5e already does with its action economy.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jaeger, post: 8187301, member: 27996"] My aim would be to have a version that is between 5e an B/X in [I]running[/I] complexity. But with more choices available to PC's during advancement. TSR managed to turn out gobs of material for B/X somehow. And who said the dedicated VTT would be free? There are plenty of issues in play with 5e that could use a second look. And [I]streamline[/I] does not = simplify. That is one of the weaknesses of the system IMHO. D&D needs 3-6 standard combat maneuvers/options that any PC can do. And they need no be complex multi roll affairs. Just viable tactics that can be better options in certain situations other than [I]"I hit him with my best attack"[/I] over and over again. They need not add more complexity than what 5e already does with its action economy. [/QUOTE]

Verification