Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Brown Jenkin" data-source="post: 654964" data-attributes="member: 2572">That was me who wrote that and I still stick by it. Previously in the posting I said I like 90% of what they were doing but thought that this didn't work. As you pointed out &quot;the R&amp;D mantra for revised 3e, &quot;do no harm.&quot; If there was something cool to change but it didn't really need to be done, it wasn't.&quot; This seems to contradict what they are doing. As far as I can tell this was not a major issue and was done because it was cool. As a result great harm has been done to its backwards compatability. I appologize to the individual developers if they were insulted, but not to WotC which IMO is no longer the company that cares and is rapidly devolving to T$R. If WotC cared they would not be gutting thier staff, producing unfinished products, and allowing changes to a revision that invalidates large chuncks of 3rd party stuff I have invested in after only 3 years.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Brown Jenkin, post: 654964, member: 2572"] That was me who wrote that and I still stick by it. Previously in the posting I said I like 90% of what they were doing but thought that this didn't work. As you pointed out "the R&D mantra for revised 3e, "do no harm." If there was something cool to change but it didn't really need to be done, it wasn't." This seems to contradict what they are doing. As far as I can tell this was not a major issue and was done because it was cool. As a result great harm has been done to its backwards compatability. I appologize to the individual developers if they were insulted, but not to WotC which IMO is no longer the company that cares and is rapidly devolving to T$R. If WotC cared they would not be gutting thier staff, producing unfinished products, and allowing changes to a revision that invalidates large chuncks of 3rd party stuff I have invested in after only 3 years. [/QUOTE]

Verification