Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Petrosian" data-source="post: 681522" data-attributes="member: 1149">. [/B]</blockquote>No they are not.If you look back 3-4 pages you will see this very thought gone over once or twice. Given the presence of even nominally greedy merchants, the golf-baggie of weapons will indeed be a full sack, filled with various weapons that end up not being very special at all. This is old news.No one describing the golf-baggie of weapons is claiming it will be a representation of flawless creature knowledge at all. that nonsense is being created and tossed in by those who hope to convince people the golf baggie is wrong even if it is encouraged by the rules.Maybe its a secret conspiracy caused by bunnies.Ok, so are you just arguing with yourself or did someone actually claim this was what was expected in the golf-baggie scenario?When someone says "a smart adventurer will carry extra food" do you jump up and down frothing about how they cannot assume they know exactly how long they will be out?you seem to be railing against a mythic beast "perfect flawless knowledge of monsters" that no one has claimed to be. You are arguing against a phantom of your own devising.That of course is a valid lifestyle choice, and maybe once you are done you could join the rest of us here for the discussion perhaps?Same as every other piece of gear. it has an encumbrance value and is most likely stored in the cheap haversack or bag of holding.Except for the silver weapon, most prepared fighters carry what they think they will need. The exceptions are those for whom the character concept is not amenable to such. Fortunately most character concepts are not wholly impractical. The key becomes when the rules change to increase the punishment factor for a very common character concept... the warrior with one or at most two weapons, often just one special weapon.Most do. (Though of course the magic side is wholly dependent on what magical support is within the party itself.)[/QUOTE]

Verification