Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gilwen" data-source="post: 4694418" data-attributes="member: 1871">I mention it because it seems people are crying foul  on WOTC for not allowing certain things to be published under this brand or even giving them the same amount of freedom that was had under the OGL. The license is so you can play in their pool not the other way around. The restrictions are there to protect the brands image. How is that inappropriate. This is a subjective condition but it I would imagine it is in most contracts that deal with a third party representing a company or their brands/IP/whatever. This restriction is a condition subject to WOTC satisfaction. I don't think this issue is a strict as people want to make especially considering there was a hell of a lot of publishing going on under similar conditions in the D20STLGil</blockquote>