Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Revised Metamind
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 3858252" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Sure, go put your foot in it again. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You are still using words inappropriately. I didn't get anything wrong. The rules of GO are a subset of the game of GO. The decisions in GO are the other subset. One is not complicated, the other is. There is nothing left in <strong>the game of GO</strong> (the rules and playing the game), so I covered both. Just to make sure we were talking apples and apples. I didn't want you to accuse me of saying that the rules of GO were complicated or some such. Course, you are accusing me of being wrong, so I guess you'll continue to use words however you want. shrug.</p><p></p><p>PS. Complicated still does not mean tedious or unneccessary or intensive. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Just because I understand does not mean that I am playing dumb. It means that I am clariifying, just on the off chance that I am not understanding.</p><p></p><p>From now on, when you don't start your first sentence in your first post out with an attack, I'll start to read more charitably. Deal?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course you attacked it, hence, my less than charitable responses. Not because Bruce designed it, but because I kept it in my design.</p><p></p><p>There is nothing significantly wrong with FM and you attacked that opinion whereas I defended it.</p><p></p><p>And of couse, this justification of yours here of attacking Bruce's design instead of mine (lame as it is) still did not give you the right to attack my player and his preferences which I notice that you did apologize for.</p><p></p><p>Why don't we just call a truce? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 3858252, member: 2011"] Sure, go put your foot in it again. :lol: You are still using words inappropriately. I didn't get anything wrong. The rules of GO are a subset of the game of GO. The decisions in GO are the other subset. One is not complicated, the other is. There is nothing left in [b]the game of GO[/b] (the rules and playing the game), so I covered both. Just to make sure we were talking apples and apples. I didn't want you to accuse me of saying that the rules of GO were complicated or some such. Course, you are accusing me of being wrong, so I guess you'll continue to use words however you want. shrug. PS. Complicated still does not mean tedious or unneccessary or intensive. :lol: Just because I understand does not mean that I am playing dumb. It means that I am clariifying, just on the off chance that I am not understanding. From now on, when you don't start your first sentence in your first post out with an attack, I'll start to read more charitably. Deal? Of course you attacked it, hence, my less than charitable responses. Not because Bruce designed it, but because I kept it in my design. There is nothing significantly wrong with FM and you attacked that opinion whereas I defended it. And of couse, this justification of yours here of attacking Bruce's design instead of mine (lame as it is) still did not give you the right to attack my player and his preferences which I notice that you did apologize for. Why don't we just call a truce? :confused: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Revised Metamind
Top