Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger (Final Draft)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thurmas" data-source="post: 7299202" data-attributes="member: 6866167"><p>The intention is that the Hunter subclass adds the Hunter's Mark damage to his attack with out having to Hunter's Mark creatures. It can still Hunter's Mark creatures in order to gain the other abilities of Hunter's Mark, just no bonus damage.</p><p></p><p>So, this is the way I approached this. First, Hunter's Mark needed to be an ability, not a spell. </p><p></p><p>Second, I'll work backwards a little bit. A paladin (The ranger's closest analog) gets Improved Smite at level 11, an extra 1d8 damage for each attack. That's already better then what this Ranger has, since the Ranger gets the same damage to each attack, but has to use it's bonus action to do so. The exception here is the Hunter subclass, which works the exact same way that the Paladin does, each adding 1d8 damage to all attacks. On top of this, the Paladin has the option to burn spell slots on Smite's (And cherry pick crits if he desires), something the Ranger can't do. It gets a little more competitive when the Hunter's Mark damage goes up to 1d10, but it still favors the Paladin.</p><p></p><p>So, at the levels before 11, the Ranger doesn't necessarily have an edge, it just works differently. Again, compared to the Paladin the Ranger does more sustained damage turn after turn, at the cost of his bonus action. The Paladin however, gets much more burst damage in the form of Smites, with no bonus action cost. It takes the ranger 4 hits (4d4) to get the same amount of damage as a single Paladin level 1 Smite (2d8). Both abilities are gained at level 2.</p><p></p><p>Also, for all classes but the Hunter, they lose any additional Favored Enemy damage, since that is now Hunter exclusive.</p><p></p><p>The Hunter loses the level 3 abilities that situationally add 1d8/reaction attack/extra attack within 5', but gains the most from the Hunter's Mark improvement.</p><p></p><p>That's my just justification for this issue. I think it all balances out nicely. I'm still open to criticism! Thanks for the feedback.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thurmas, post: 7299202, member: 6866167"] The intention is that the Hunter subclass adds the Hunter's Mark damage to his attack with out having to Hunter's Mark creatures. It can still Hunter's Mark creatures in order to gain the other abilities of Hunter's Mark, just no bonus damage. So, this is the way I approached this. First, Hunter's Mark needed to be an ability, not a spell. Second, I'll work backwards a little bit. A paladin (The ranger's closest analog) gets Improved Smite at level 11, an extra 1d8 damage for each attack. That's already better then what this Ranger has, since the Ranger gets the same damage to each attack, but has to use it's bonus action to do so. The exception here is the Hunter subclass, which works the exact same way that the Paladin does, each adding 1d8 damage to all attacks. On top of this, the Paladin has the option to burn spell slots on Smite's (And cherry pick crits if he desires), something the Ranger can't do. It gets a little more competitive when the Hunter's Mark damage goes up to 1d10, but it still favors the Paladin. So, at the levels before 11, the Ranger doesn't necessarily have an edge, it just works differently. Again, compared to the Paladin the Ranger does more sustained damage turn after turn, at the cost of his bonus action. The Paladin however, gets much more burst damage in the form of Smites, with no bonus action cost. It takes the ranger 4 hits (4d4) to get the same amount of damage as a single Paladin level 1 Smite (2d8). Both abilities are gained at level 2. Also, for all classes but the Hunter, they lose any additional Favored Enemy damage, since that is now Hunter exclusive. The Hunter loses the level 3 abilities that situationally add 1d8/reaction attack/extra attack within 5', but gains the most from the Hunter's Mark improvement. That's my just justification for this issue. I think it all balances out nicely. I'm still open to criticism! Thanks for the feedback. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger (Final Draft)
Top