Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger Play Report... (level 3 to 4, beastmaster)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cyber-Dave" data-source="post: 6922020" data-attributes="member: 82132"><p>If you are playing by the rules as written, it is inherent; that is the problem. Making it possible for the ranger to get that information with certainty can create a headache for the DM, and isn't something my DM is ok with. Hence, we are not using the rules as written. My DM has the leeway to decide how much information I can or cannot gain on a case by case basis. Up to now, my use of the power has been reasonable enough that he has given me the information I sought without a check. He, however, reserves the right to require a check or even inform me that the information I seek cannot be obtained through the power, even if, in the rules as written, it could be. Hence my use of a question...</p><p></p><p>The observation of note is that the power, as written, is bothersome enough that at least one DM has felt the need to not use it as written. I doubt my DM will be alone in that decision. I find his reasoning logical. I would probably do the same. That means that, so far, in this thread, counting my DM (even though he has not posted here directly), there are already 3 people who have an issue with the ability. This suggests that the power might be problematic as written. It would suck if the new ranger ended up resulting in a large number of players, even a sizable minority, being forced to use a modified version of the power. If my play experiences resonate with the feedback from the poll, I hope this particular power will be revised.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cyber-Dave, post: 6922020, member: 82132"] If you are playing by the rules as written, it is inherent; that is the problem. Making it possible for the ranger to get that information with certainty can create a headache for the DM, and isn't something my DM is ok with. Hence, we are not using the rules as written. My DM has the leeway to decide how much information I can or cannot gain on a case by case basis. Up to now, my use of the power has been reasonable enough that he has given me the information I sought without a check. He, however, reserves the right to require a check or even inform me that the information I seek cannot be obtained through the power, even if, in the rules as written, it could be. Hence my use of a question... The observation of note is that the power, as written, is bothersome enough that at least one DM has felt the need to not use it as written. I doubt my DM will be alone in that decision. I find his reasoning logical. I would probably do the same. That means that, so far, in this thread, counting my DM (even though he has not posted here directly), there are already 3 people who have an issue with the ability. This suggests that the power might be problematic as written. It would suck if the new ranger ended up resulting in a large number of players, even a sizable minority, being forced to use a modified version of the power. If my play experiences resonate with the feedback from the poll, I hope this particular power will be revised. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger Play Report... (level 3 to 4, beastmaster)
Top