Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger Play Report... (level 3 to 4, beastmaster)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cyber-Dave" data-source="post: 6922264" data-attributes="member: 82132"><p>So, you were looking for a specific set or type of data because you assumed, in advance, that the problem could only be localized there? Um. Ok. That doesn't seem useful to me, but whatever. My specific game has a problem with this class feature because my DM looked at the feature and instantly started to worry about how much work it would be for him to both prepare games if I used it in certain frustrating ways and adjudicate during play if he failed to prepare for certain unexpected uses. He told me as much, as he didn't want me to get frustrated at the table, and he didn't want to get frustrated at the table either. I said no problem, I get your logic. I asked if I could still try and use it. He said sure, but it might not always give me the information I want (even if it would in the RAW) and might sometimes require a skill check to give me the information I want. I said no problem. </p><p></p><p>The only problem is that the rule forced us to have that discussion in the first place. Ideally, the RAW is easy enough to use that no such discussion ever has to take place; since reality isn't ideal, the design goal should be that no such discussion ever has to take place at the tables of any sizable portion of the fan-base. I have no idea if it does or doesn't. I don't have the data required to make that call. It, however, is starting to sound like evidence in the community has suggested that it does, which suggests that the rule should be modified, and that bothers you because you like the rule as is... is that what is happening here? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Establishing large quantities of specific data on the spot is a difficult task for most humans. Keeping track of all possible outcomes that such specific data could have is even more difficult for most humans. The likelihood of an emergent result which somebody finds to be unpleasant occurring at a game table is high. What are you not seeing? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>50 feet of hempen rope doesn't generate a large quantity of specific effects as well. In fact, its a good example of what I would like Primeval Awareness to become more like--a wide variety of potential uses, but a very acute list of specific effects, as most of the effects it can potentially produce (let alone certainly produce) will require on the spot holistic adjudication on the part of the DM.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cyber-Dave, post: 6922264, member: 82132"] So, you were looking for a specific set or type of data because you assumed, in advance, that the problem could only be localized there? Um. Ok. That doesn't seem useful to me, but whatever. My specific game has a problem with this class feature because my DM looked at the feature and instantly started to worry about how much work it would be for him to both prepare games if I used it in certain frustrating ways and adjudicate during play if he failed to prepare for certain unexpected uses. He told me as much, as he didn't want me to get frustrated at the table, and he didn't want to get frustrated at the table either. I said no problem, I get your logic. I asked if I could still try and use it. He said sure, but it might not always give me the information I want (even if it would in the RAW) and might sometimes require a skill check to give me the information I want. I said no problem. The only problem is that the rule forced us to have that discussion in the first place. Ideally, the RAW is easy enough to use that no such discussion ever has to take place; since reality isn't ideal, the design goal should be that no such discussion ever has to take place at the tables of any sizable portion of the fan-base. I have no idea if it does or doesn't. I don't have the data required to make that call. It, however, is starting to sound like evidence in the community has suggested that it does, which suggests that the rule should be modified, and that bothers you because you like the rule as is... is that what is happening here? Establishing large quantities of specific data on the spot is a difficult task for most humans. Keeping track of all possible outcomes that such specific data could have is even more difficult for most humans. The likelihood of an emergent result which somebody finds to be unpleasant occurring at a game table is high. What are you not seeing? 50 feet of hempen rope doesn't generate a large quantity of specific effects as well. In fact, its a good example of what I would like Primeval Awareness to become more like--a wide variety of potential uses, but a very acute list of specific effects, as most of the effects it can potentially produce (let alone certainly produce) will require on the spot holistic adjudication on the part of the DM. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Revised Ranger Play Report... (level 3 to 4, beastmaster)
Top